The Allahabad High Court acquitted three individuals in a 44-year-old murder case, citing a lack of sufficient evidence. The Court emphasized the importance of a fair judicial process, emphasizing the burden of proof on the prosecution and the need to consider the rights of the accused. The acquittal was based on doubts raised regarding the case.
![[Swati Maliwal Case] Delhi Police Alleged "Brutal Assault" Against Maliwal, Files Affidavit in SC Opposing Bail for Bibhav Kumar](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-35-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 27th May, A Delhi court denied bail to Bibhav Kumar, an aide of Arvind Kejriwal, accused of assaulting AAP MP Swati Maliwal. The incident, with political implications due to the individuals involved, has legal and socio-cultural significance. Kumar’s association with Kejriwal and the AAP makes the case politically impactful, affecting the party’s image and potential electoral prospects.
![[Breaking] Activist Medha Patkar Gets 5 Months Jail in Defamation Case by LG VK Saxena](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-49.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 24th May, Medha Patkar convicted in a defamation case filed by VK Saxena for making defamatory statements. The ruling holds legal implications, as she faces up to two years in jail or a fine. This marks a significant development in their long-standing legal dispute. Additionally, Patkar faces charges of fraud in a separate case.
Yesterday, On 24th May, a businessman from Uttar Pradesh sentenced to life imprisonment for the brutal assault on his pregnant wife. The incident, which took place last year, revealed a chilling narrative of domestic violence that culminated in an act of extreme cruelty. The victim, who was in the late stages of her pregnancy, suffered severe injuries that not only endangered her life but also threatened the life of her unborn child.
![[Journalist Assault] AAP Media Coordinator's Bail Dismissed by Court Citing 'Not Maintainable'](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-17-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 24th May, The Tis Hazari Court in Delhi dismissed AAP Media Coordinator Vikas Kumar Yogi’s anticipatory bail plea in the journalist assault case for procedural inadequacy as the mentioned offenses are currently bailable. The court highlighted legal challenges faced by the accused, citing a typographical error in the police statement and lack of grounds for custodial interrogation.
![[Kejriwal Metro Graffiti Case] Delhi Court Grants Bail to Accused](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-40.png?resize=400%2C300&ssl=1)
Today, On 22nd May, A Delhi court granted bail to Ankit Goel, accused of defacing metro property with graffiti targeting Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. The 33-year-old from Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, was granted bail on the grounds that the charges against him are bailable. The investigation revealed the suspect’s movements and activities, including recording and sharing videos of the graffiti.
Today, On 16th May, Swati Maliwal accuses an unnamed individual of manipulating videos to protect themselves, raising concerns about political tactics and media integrity. She alleges assault by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s personal secretary and filed an FIR with detailed accounts of the incident. The accused individual’s attempts at self-protection through video manipulation are under scrutiny.
Today, 14th May, The Calcutta High Court addressed concerns of police overaction raised by ex-judge Abhijit Gangopadhyay, highlighting potential issues with law enforcement’s actions. Gangopadhyay, a BJP candidate, sought to quash an FIR filed against him, alleging political motivation. The case was removed from the list and referred to the Chief Justice for reassignment.
The Delhi High Court criticized a lower court’s decision to discharge two individuals accused of child pornography involvement, citing procedural errors. A public interest litigation challenged the decision, leading the high court to convert it into a suo motu revision petition. The court ordered a reassessment of the evidence and appointed an advocate to assist. A notice was issued to the accused for explanation. The CBI decided not to appeal the lower court’s ruling. The High Court clarified that PIL is generally not entertained in criminal matters.