The CBFC has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court in the Jana Nayagan release case, asking that no order be passed without hearing it. The move follows the Madras High Court’s decision to flag concerns over references to the Army and religious sentiments in the film.
The Supreme Court of India will hear on January 19 the plea filed by the producer of Jana Nayagan against the Madras High Court’s interim stay on CBFC clearance. The case has put on hold the Pongal release of Vijay’s politically significant film.
The producers of Vijay’s final film Jana Nayagan have approached the Madras High Court after the Central Board of Film Certification referred the film to a Revising Committee despite earlier clearance.
The makers claim the last-minute move threatens the film’s scheduled release and could cause massive financial losses.
The Delhi High Court told the CBFC to consider sending the Dhurandhar film dispute to the Army. It made the remark while hearing objections from Major Mohit Sharma’s parents about unauthorized portrayals in the movie and covert details.
Family of Late Major Mohit Sharma has approached the Delhi High Court seeking to stop the release of the film ‘Dhurandhar’. They claim the movie was made “without obtaining permission from either the Indian Army or his family.”
The Delhi High Court refused to stop the release of “The Taj Story”, criticizing the poorly prepared PIL and noting that artistic expression cannot be curtailed. The Bench said the petitioner may approach the Centre under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act.
Justice V.G. Arun privately viewed Haal, starring Shane Nigam, as its makers challenge the CBFC’s demand to cut key scenes. The film faces objections from the Catholic Congress over alleged religious depictions.
The Delhi High Court refused to certify filmmaker Shyam Bharteey’s Masoom Kaatil, ruling that films mocking religions, glorifying violence, and promoting disharmony cannot be allowed in a secular society. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora said such content risks public peace and corrupts young minds.
Bombay High Court slammed CBFC for refusing to certify the film Ajey without even watching it. The Court said rejection must follow proper legal process, not assumptions.
Today, On 1st August, Delhi High Court directs Centre to re-examine its decision on Udaipur Files, asking, “Where is your authority to recommend cuts?” The court questioned the legal basis behind the advisory to revise the film’s content.
