The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings against a deceased employee’s widow cannot be a ground to deny compassionate appointment to the son. Allowing Atul Chauhan’s appeal, the Court directed consideration of his claim under applicable Haryana service rules.
The Delhi High Court granted Umar Khalid three-day interim bail to visit his ailing mother in the hospital. It directed that he remain at the specified address and only visit his mother, restricting him from going anywhere else.
The Supreme Court set aside the rape conviction of a man, noting the case arose from a consensual relationship that soured and turned criminal. “Sixth Sense Suggests They Might Reconcile,” the court observed, citing a unique reason.
The Uttarakhand High Court observed that “compensation is not merely financial relief but a principle of social justice,” while upholding Rs.53.93 lakh awarded to a victim’s family and dismissing the insurance company’s appeal against the 2024 MACT order.
Madras High Court judge, Justice G.R. Swaminathan along with his wife, visited the home of a bedridden litigant’s father to personally assess his mental state, ensuring fair evaluation amid claims of unsoundness raised during the legal proceedings.
Bhopal/Jabalpur: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has declared that a son-in-law is included under the Maintenance & Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. This law requires children to take care of their elderly parents, and the court’s decision makes it clear that even a son-in-law has this responsibility.
Today, On 7th January, The Supreme Court is hearing the case of Atul Subhash, a 34-year-old who died by suicide in December. Atul had accused Nikita Singhania and her family of harassment through false cases, causing immense pressure on him and his parents. During the hearing, Nikita’s lawyer responded to questions about the whereabouts of Atul’s son. The case continues to gather significant public and legal attention.
