The Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail to a 27-year-old rape accused, observing that the complaint showed signs of a consensual relationship. The Court said, “Failed consensual relationship is not a ground to allege rape.”
The Supreme Court of India quashed an FIR against a man, filed by his estranged wife, claiming false representation about his medical qualifications and skin condition. The court found the allegations baseless, noting the wife was aware of her husband’s qualifications prior to their marriage, deeming the case an abuse of legal process.
The Supreme Court of India quashed a dowry harassment case due to vague accusations against the husband’s family. The bench criticized the trend of naming multiple relatives without clear evidence and emphasized that strong, specific allegations are essential. This judgment reflects the court’s stance against the misuse of dowry laws.
![[BREAKING] Saif Ali Khan's Attack Case: Mumbai Court Orders 5-Day Police Custody: Accused Claims He is being Framed](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Saif-Attacker-Gets-5-Day-Police-Custody-Tells-Court-Hes-Being-Framed.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Mumbai: Today(19th Jan): A court in Mumbai has given the city police five days of custody of Shariful Islam Shehzad, a Bangladeshi national arrested for allegedly breaking into actor Saif Ali Khan’s house. The incident took place late on Wednesday night, during which the accused reportedly injured the actor and his staff.
The Bombay High Court ruled that keeping a mother’s four-year-old daughter away from her is “cruelty” under IPC Section 498-A. Despite a lower court’s custody order, the child is withheld, causing mental harassment. The court upheld an FIR against the mother’s in-laws, emphasizing ongoing mental injury and contempt of judicial orders.
Today (16th April): The Delhi High Court ordered the removal of tweets and YouTube videos falsely alleging Gaurav Bhatia’s assault, citing concerns over “deepfake videos”. The court deemed these claims baseless and defamatory, highlighting the risk of future misuse. It directed the removal of the content until the pending defamation suit is resolved.