Today, On 28th May, The Supreme Court described the Delhi Ridge tree-cutting issue as “a case of institutional missteps and administrative overreach,” while letting the Delhi LG and DDA off the hook in the contempt case, citing broader public welfare considerations.
The Supreme Court of India has ordered a halt to the demolition of Bale Shah Peer Dargah in Uttan, maintaining the status quo. A notice was issued to the Maharashtra government regarding its previous actions. The case will be revisited in four weeks, following concerns over alleged illegal construction in a protected area.
The Supreme Court of India has instructed the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) to investigate claims regarding an illegal embankment on the Yamuna River near Kalesar Wildlife Sanctuary, purportedly for mining. This step emphasizes the judicial commitment to environmental protection and the importance of expert evaluation in addressing potential habitat disruptions.
The Supreme Court of India reinforced its 2015 order prohibiting tree felling within 5 kilometers of the Taj Mahal without permission. The ruling applies to the Taj Trapezium Zone, requiring approval from the court for any tree felling and emphasizing compliance with environmental protections, especially concerning other heritage sites.
Supreme Court judge Justice Surya Kant said that Indian courts don’t treat the law as just a strict rulebook. He shared that courts also protect constitutional values by giving the law modern and fair meanings. This allows the law to grow along with the changing society. According to him, this reflects the courts’ commitment to both justice and constitutional morality.
India is the first country to adopt an eco-centric approach over a human-centric one in international jurisprudence. This shift prioritizes the well-being of the entire ecosystem rather than just human needs. Supreme Court judge Justice PS Narasimha highlighted this development at the National Conference on Environment-2025. The move reflects a broader commitment to environmental protection in legal frameworks.
NEW DELHI: On Friday, the Supreme Court of India decided not to interfere in an ongoing case regarding illegal tree felling in Delhi. Instead, it has left the decision to the Delhi High Court on whether it wants to continue hearing the matter, even though a similar issue is under consideration by the apex court.
Justice Abhay Sreenivas Oka, born on May 25, 1960, assumed office on August 31, 2021. He authored 82 judgments and is recognized for his commitment to social change and justice. His judicial career includes crucial contributions to civil liberties and environmental protection, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic, advocating for marginalized communities.
Justice Surya Kant, born on February 10, 1962, has served on the Supreme Court since May 24, 2019, and is set to retire on February 9, 2027. Notable for his 54 authored judgments, he previously held key legal positions including Advocate General of Haryana and Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh, contributing significantly to Indian law.