The Supreme Court of India refused pleas on the Aravalli Zoo Safari, saying no one will be allowed to touch the Aravalli Range. A bench led by Surya Kant with Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi deferred permissions temporarily.
The Supreme Court directed the Mumbai civic body to submit detailed affidavits and afforestation plans in the Aarey case. It ordered multiple status reports with timelines, videography, and progress updates, scheduling further review in March–April 2026.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Haryana government to present its strategy to remedy severe environmental damage caused by illegal mining in Pichopa Kalan village of Charki Dadri, an Aravalli district. The court sought a clear plan.
Today, on 29th January, the Delhi High Court termed the illegal slaughter of chickens and birds at Ghazipur Murga Mandi “horrifying” after examining photographs. A Division Bench questioned whether its September 24, 2018 order banning such slaughter was being openly ignored by authorities.
The Supreme Court has ruled that alleged violations of building plans do not fall within the jurisdiction of the National Green Tribunal under Section 14 of the NGT Act. The Court held that the NGT exceeded its powers by intervening in construction disputes already pending before the High Court.
The Calcutta High Court has taken suo motu cognisance of the hazardous air pollution crisis in the Kolkata–Howrah region after AQI levels touched 330–350. The Court has sought responses from the West Bengal government and concerned authorities, calling the situation a continuing public health emergency.
The Supreme Court questioned DDA’s request to fell 473 trees for a road project, seeking strict proof of compliance with earlier plantation orders. CJI Surya Kant stressed that no permission will be granted without real, on-ground afforestation, not “AI-generated forests.”
The Supreme Court’s Aravalli hills verdict has triggered nationwide outrage over fears of expanded mining and environmental damage. Former CJI B.R. Gavai defended the ruling in a heated interview with Arnab Goswami, saying the matter is not closed and can still be reviewed.
Justice N Kotiswar Singh said India’s environmental law grew mainly due to the rise of PILs in the 1970s–80s. He highlighted how expanded locus standi and Article 21 shaped the country’s green jurisprudence.
The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of Pollution Control Boards to impose environmental compensation and demand bank guarantees under the Water and Air Acts. The decision strengthens preventive action against polluters based on the “polluter pays” principle.
