BREAKING| 7-Year Bar Practice Qualifies Judicial Officers for District Judge Posts: Supreme Court’s Big Ruling

Today, On 9th October, Supreme Court rules that judicial officers who have completed 7 years of practice at the Bar before joining service are now eligible for appointment as District Judges. Minimum age for application set at 35 years.

Can Judicial Officer with 7+ Years at Bar Eligible for District Judge Post ?: Supreme Court Debates

Today, On 23rd September, Supreme Court debates whether judicial officers with seven or more years of experience under the Bar vacancies, can be eligible for direct recruitment as District Judges. The hearing focused on interpretation of Article 233 and past legal precedents.

BREAKING |Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy: Supreme Court 5-Judge Bench Commences Hearing

Today, On 23rd September, A five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court has commenced hearing on the eligibility of judicial officers for appointment as district judges under Bar vacancies, addressing a crucial legal question with wide implications for judicial recruitment.

When Vacancies Were First Notified, Enrollment Wasn’t Required: Supreme Court Allows Prosecutors & Govt Advocates in Chhattisgarh Judicial Service Exam Without Bar Enrollment

Today, On 19th September, The Supreme Court, allowing Chhattisgarh Judicial Service candidates to sit for the exam without Bar Council enrollment, said, “When vacancies were first notified, enrollment wasn’t required.” The decision gives interim relief ahead of the preliminary exam this Sunday.

BREAKING | Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy : Supreme Court to Hear Case On September 23

Today, On 12th September, The Supreme Court Constitution Bench agreed that it will hear on September 23 on whether a judicial officer with more than seven years’ bar experience before joining service can be considered eligible for appointment as a district judge in bar quota vacancies.

Breaking: ‘This Will Open Pandora’s Box’: Supreme Court Refuses to Let Judges Take Fresh Judicial Exams, Upholds 3-Year Law Practice Rule

The Supreme Court refused to modify its verdict, keeping the three-year law practice requirement for eligibility in judicial services exams. Serving judges cannot use their experience to appear for fresh exams in other states.

Women Army Officers vs Discrimination: Supreme Court Begins Hearing on Denial of Permanent Commission

Today, On 6th August, The Supreme Court started hearing petitions by women Army officers from the Short Service Commission, alleging discrimination in denial of permanent commission. Similar petitions from the Navy and Air Force will be heard next.

Civil Judge Exam 2022 : Supreme Court Allows MP High Court to Proceed with Interviews & Results

The Supreme Court has allowed the Madhya Pradesh High Court to conduct interviews and declare results for the 2022 Civil Judge (Junior Division) Exam after learning that 77 candidates cleared the main examination.

Supreme Court: “Neglecting the Resettlement of Veterans Could Deter Talented Youth from Joining the Armed Forces”

The Supreme Court cautioned that failing to prioritise the resettlement of ex-servicemen may affect future recruitment in the military. It said such neglect could discourage talented youth from choosing a career in the armed forces.

Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Minimum Marks Requirement for Judiciary Selection

Punjab: The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday (18th March) rejected a petition that challenged the requirement of minimum marks for selecting judges for the district judiciary. The petitioner had argued that there should be no mandatory minimum marks for judicial selections. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel ruled that setting a minimum marks requirement is necessary to maintain the quality of the judiciary.