The Madras High Court sought a response from the Election Commission of India on allegations that Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam used children during the 2026 Tamil Nadu election campaign, while questioning whether a political party itself could face disqualification for corrupt practices.
Calcutta High Court cautioned against routine preventive detention during West Bengal polls, stressing it must be exceptional. Bench of Arijit Banerjee and Partha Sarathi Sen upheld free, fair elections and personal liberty protections.
Calcutta High Court declined interim relief affecting poll officials during West Bengal elections. Krishna Rao held electoral process must remain undisturbed, deferring intervention until completion of polling phase.
Supreme Court of India refused to interfere with Delhi High Court ruling upholding EC’s power to classify parties. Decision affirms validity of Election Symbols Order 1968 governing national and state party recognition.
Calcutta High Court barred motorbike rallies and group riding during West Bengal polls to maintain order. Bench of Shampa Sarkar and Ajay Kumar Gupta expanded restrictions citing law and order concerns.
Calcutta High Court is hearing TMC plea alleging misconduct by police observer in West Bengal elections. Petition under Article 226 filed by Rajeev Kumar questions neutrality of election monitoring process.
Supreme Court of India moved by T. N. Prathapan alleging Election Commission of India inaction over MCC violation. Plea targets broadcast of Narendra Modi speech during election period.
Calcutta High Court stayed Election Commission of India directions tagging 800 individuals as troublemakers before polls. Bench led by Sujoy Paul found prima facie error in issuing blanket orders against citizens.
Madras High Court dismissed PIL against P. Umanath over MCC violation allegations. Bench led by Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari found no merit and denied relief in petition.
Madras High Court issued notice to Vijay, Election Commission of India and Income Tax Department over affidavit discrepancies. Bench noted apparent irregularity but sought responses before examining merits of case further.
