The Supreme Court asked whether the NOTA option has truly improved the “quality” of elected leaders, observing that it cannot fill a seat even if it gets maximum votes. The Court is hearing a plea seeking NOTA in uncontested elections and has listed the matter for March 17.
Today, On 24th February, The Supreme Court, hearing claims of Aadhaar misuse for Rohingyas in West Bengal, said, “This needs a deeper probe and the court is not a forum for this.” It advised advocate Ashwini Upadhyay to approach the Union government.
Today, On 24th February, In the West Bengal SIR case, the Supreme Court of India permitted deploying civil judges and seeking officers from nearby states From Odisha & Jharkhand. It said even if each judge handles 250 cases daily, the verification would still need eighty days.
The Supreme Court declined to entertain a plea by 91 Akbar Nagar residents alleging removal of their names from UP’s SIR voter rolls. The Court directed District Election Officers to verify the facts and allowed petitioners to approach the High Court if grievances persist.
During the heated Special Intensive Revision (SIR) hearing, CJI Surya Kant dismissed Kapil Sibal’s warning about possible law and order issues and allowed phased publication of voter rolls. The Supreme Court also rejected objections raised by Abhishek Manu Singhvi and backed the Election Commission.
The Calcutta High Court has cancelled leave of judicial officers till March 9 to fast-track disposal of 45 lakh disputed SIR cases. A total of 173 judges will work under CCTV monitoring to meet the Election Commission’s voter list deadline.
The Supreme Court, hearing Mamata Banerjee’s plea against the Election Commission’s SIR exercise, expressed concern over a “blame game” and lack of cooperation between the State and ECI. The Bench hinted at appointing judicial officers to resolve the impasse in the sensitive voter revision process.
The Supreme Court refused to hear a PIL seeking a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Assam, saying the final voter list has already been published. The Court observed that “Nothing survives now” as the revision process has been completed
The Madras High Court refused to stay the Election Commission of India’s decision to de-register political parties that did not contest elections for six years. The Court said restoring their status at this stage would amount to granting final relief before the case is fully heard.
The Supreme Court refused to hear a plea challenging the ‘logical discrepancy’ category in West Bengal’s Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. The Court directed the petitioner to approach the Election Commission instead of invoking Article 32 jurisdiction.
