Madras High Court issues restraining order on DMK membership drive; DMK denies collecting Aadhaar and OTPs, calling allegations “false and misleading” amid privacy violation claims.
Former TN Minister Senthil Balaji urges Supreme Court to expunge critical observations from 2022 verdict, citing threat to fair trial. Claims strong language may bias ongoing proceedings.
Madras High Court confirms Ajith Kumar died due to police torture, citing 44 injuries. CBI given deadline till August 20 to complete probe.
Madras High Court declines to close suo motu case against ex-Minister K Ponmudi for lewd joke on Shaivite-Vaishnavite tilaks. Court warns politicians can’t misuse Article 19 under the guise of free speech.
Popular Tamil and Telugu actor Srikanth has been sent to judicial custody by a Chennai court in a cocaine-related case. The court has ordered that he remain in custody till July 7 as the investigation continues.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin has condemned President Droupadi Murmu’s request to the Supreme Court regarding timelines for Governor assent on State Bills. He argues it undermines constitutional authority and calls it a tactic to weaken opposition-led governments. The Supreme Court previously ruled against delays by the Tamil Nadu Governor, emphasizing judicial authority.
Former Supreme Court judge Jasti Chelameswar said that if courts can cancel laws made by Parliament for being unconstitutional, then they also have the right to tell public officials to do their legal duties.
The Supreme Court of India is reviewing petitions against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which challenges the de-notification of properties declared as waqf. The court emphasized the importance of preserving existing waqf properties and expressed concerns over controversial provisions in the Amendment Act, indicating a possible interim order to address these issues.
TVK chief and actor-turned-politician Vijay has moved the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf Act. He joins a growing list of petitioners who argue that the Act is discriminatory and infringes upon fundamental rights. The case has sparked nationwide debate over religious laws and constitutional protections.
Intervention applications supporting the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, were filed in the Supreme Court, arguing that the amendments align with the Constitution of India and do not infringe on Muslim rights. Various individuals and organizations have also challenged the Act, claiming it discriminates against the Muslim community and allows excessive government interference.
