The Delhi High Court dismissed a husband’s appeal against his contempt conviction, holding that ongoing settlement negotiations cannot excuse non-compliance with binding court orders. The Court upheld directions concerning his passport and reaffirmed the obligation to fulfil maintenance-related financial responsibilities pending resolution of disputes.
The Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy under Article 21 cannot shield a spouse accused of adultery from disclosing mobile call records or hotel stay details. The Court said such evidence may be accessed to prove allegations of adultery in matrimonial disputes.
The Delhi High Court warned that spouses cannot use intimate photographs to shame each other, stressing that privacy and dignity must remain protected and matrimonial disputes should never become contests of mutual humiliation through private material.
The Jharkhand High Court upheld a divorce decree after observing that a 36-year separation had turned the marriage into a “dead wood marriage.” While ending the decades-long relationship, the Court increased permanent alimony for the wife from Rs 10 lakh to Rs 40 lakh.
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a husband’s plea seeking narco-analysis, polygraph and DNA tests in a divorce dispute. Justice Sanjeet Purohit upheld the family court order, ruling that such tests were unnecessary, delayed, and could not be imposed without consent.
The Bombay High Court refused to transfer a divorce case from Mehkar to Nanded, holding that a salaried government employee can attend matrimonial proceedings online and failed to demonstrate any genuine hardship warranting transfer of the proceedings.
Supreme Court Issues Notice On Anubhav Mohanty’s Plea Seeking Quashing Of Criminal Case Filed By Ex-Wife In Matrimonial Dispute; Odisha Government Asked To Respond As Actor Challenges Orissa HC Order
The Madras High Court held that a wife’s police complaint against husband or matrimonial family cannot alone amount to mental cruelty unless proven false or malicious. The Court dismissed husband’s divorce plea, protecting a spouse’s right to seek legal remedies.
The Telangana High Court annulled a marriage after finding that the husband had misrepresented his date of birth on an online matrimonial platform. The Court held that the incorrect age details misled the wife regarding horoscope compatibility, leading her to consent to marriage under a mistaken belief.
The Supreme Court dissolved a marriage under Article 142 of the Constitution, holding that the relationship had irretrievably broken down and was “dead for all practical purposes.” The Court set aside decisions of the Family Court and Andhra Pradesh High Court while directing a comprehensive financial settlement.
