The Supreme Court declined to intervene in the closure of schools amid Delhi’s worsening air pollution, calling the crisis a recurring issue. It issued notice to NHAI and sought concrete long-term measures to curb pollution.
In 2024, India’s Supreme Court dealt with numerous landmark rulings, focusing on personal liberty, places of worship disputes, and electoral reforms. Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna emphasized efficiency, reforming case backlogs. Notable cases included prohibitions on religious site surveys, striking down electoral bonds, and addressing environmental pollution. The court’s decisions significantly influenced legal frameworks and societal issues.
![[Breaking] "Police Done Nothing, It's Complete Failure”: SC Flags Non-Compliance With Anti-Pollution Measures in Delhi, Questions Govt. Actions](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Delhi-cant-be-made-to-go-through-this-cant-be-a-political-battle-everytime_-Top-quotes-from-SC-hearing-on-air-pollution-in-the-Delhi-NCR-_-India-News-The-Indian-Express.png?resize=414%2C232&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court expressed strong dissatisfaction in today’s hearing (28th Nov) with the government’s non-compliance with anti-pollution measures in Delhi, citing lack of action from authorities. Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati defended the government’s efforts, including traffic management directives. Meanwhile, Delhi’s air quality remains critical, with AQI levels classified as ‘very poor,’ posing health risks to citizens.
Today, On 27th September, the Supreme Court criticized the Delhi Air Quality Panel for inadequate action on worsening air pollution in the National Capital Region (NCR). The court highlighted the critical role of stubble burning from nearby states and emphasized the need for proactive measures and accountability from the Commission for Air Quality Management.
