The Supreme Court has proposed the establishment of fast-track courts in Delhi due to the alarming presence of 95 active gangster groups. The court emphasized that trial delays enable gangsters to misuse legal processes, threaten witnesses, and evade justice, stressing the need for urgent reforms to enhance public safety and law enforcement.
Today, On 13th March, President Droupadi Murmu approved a sanction for Delhi’s Anti-Corruption Bureau to investigate Manish Sisodia and Satyendar Jain. This allows authorities to proceed with a formal probe into alleged corruption charges. The decision marks a significant development in ongoing investigations against the two leaders. It reinforces the government’s stance on tackling corruption in public office.
Today, On 18th February, President Droupadi Murmu granted prosecution sanction against AAP leader Satyendar Jain, the former Delhi Health Minister. The sanction sought under Section 218 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. This decision allows legal proceedings to move forward against Jain. The 60-year-old leader faces serious charges, and the sanction paves the way for further action.
Today(August 28), a legal dispute arose between the Delhi government and the Lieutenant Governor over the debarment of Standing Counsel Avnish Ahlawat for allegedly providing false information. The conflict highlights the governance complexities and legal intricacies in disputes between Delhi’s authorities. This development adds to the ongoing power struggle between the Delhi Government and the LG.
Today, On 28th May, Atishi, an AAP leader, summoned by a Delhi court in a defamation case filed by a Delhi BJP member over her claims of BJP attempting to poach AAP MLAs. The court has directed her to appear on June 29th. This legal action reflects the escalating tension and legal scrutiny in Delhi’s political landscape.
On Tuesday(2nd April), The Delhi High Court recently concluded discussions regarding DCPCR’s petition against LG V K Saxena, raising concerns about funding cessation. Justice Prasad oversaw the case, with DCPCR choosing not to pursue the petition. A second petitioner’s withdrawal indicated a shift within DCPCR. The court’s decision brings procedural aspects and challenges facing bodies like DCPCR into focus.
![[Delhi Government vs Lieutenant Governor] Governance Dispute Intensifies with Standing Counsel's Debarment](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-69-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
