Delhi Lawyers’ Strike: Coordination Committee to Decide Fate by 8 PM Today

The Coordination Committee of All District Courts Bar Associations of Delhi will take a final decision on the ongoing lawyers’ strike against the LG’s notification allowing police to give virtual testimony. Advocates and court staff await the outcome as the strike enters its fifth day.

Delhi Lawyers Intensify Strike Over LG Order Allowing Police to Testify via Video From Stations

Lawyers across Delhi district courts staged a complete strike against the LG’s notification permitting police officers to depose from police stations via video conferencing. Bar leaders warned the move threatens fair trial rights and vowed indefinite agitation if not withdrawn.

Delhi District Court Lawyers to Continue Strike Today: “Protest Against Arbitrary Notification”

Delhi district court lawyers have decided to continue their strike today, declaring it a “protest against arbitrary notification.” The agitation includes public prosecutors, ED and CBI lawyers, and police officials refusing to appear before the courts.

Delhi Lawyers Strike: District Courts to Boycott Work on Aug 22-23 Against Allowing Police Stations to Record Evidence

All Delhi district court lawyers will abstain from work on August 22-23 to protest a notification allowing police stations to record evidence. The Bar calls it “arbitrary, unlawful and anti-justice.”

Delhi Bar Associations Demand Rs 20 Crore Pecuniary Limit for District Courts, Urge Law Minister Meghwal

Delhi’s Bar Associations are advocating for a tenfold increase in district courts’ pecuniary jurisdiction, from Rs 2 crore to Rs 20 crore, due to rising inflation. They met Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal to discuss amending the Delhi High Court Act, highlighting the need for the change to address outdated limits and reduce the High Court’s burden.

Delhi High Court: Trial Courts Must Prepare Conviction Judgment Before Declaring Accused Guilty

The Delhi High Court emphasized that trial courts must have the conviction judgment prepared before declaring an accused guilty. This ruling came after a case where two men were ordered into custody before the judgment was ready. The court directed District and Sessions Judges to ensure proper procedures to safeguard the rights of the accused.