The Delhi High Court has asked the Delhi government to consider objections raised by district court lawyers to the draft Advocates Protection Bill, 2024. The matter will be heard next on January 8.
The Delhi Transport Corporation will soon introduce a special bus service connecting major courts across the city, allowing lawyers, law clerks, and litigants to travel conveniently between court complexes at nominal fares.
The Supreme Court flagged the “staggeringly high” pendency of cheque bounce cases in metro courts and issued fresh guidelines for quicker resolution. The new rules allow voluntary compromises, graded penalties, and probation benefits to ease the strain on the judicial system.
Delhi lawyers protest a police letter proposing virtual examination of witnesses, calling it against fair trial principles. The bar council has declared an indefinite strike starting September 8.
Delhi Police has paused the L-G’s notification allowing cops to depose from police stations via video conferencing. Lawyers, who protested for six days, have now called off their strike after assurance of talks with the Union Home Minister.
A Delhi lawyer, Puneet Tomar, has written to the Chief Justice of India detailing significant issues faced by litigants and court staff, citing a 27.8% vacancy rate in judicial positions. Concerns include administrative duties burdening judges, staff shortages, and long commutes for employees, all negatively impacting court operations.
Delhi’s judicial system is anticipating significant changes with the implementation of new criminal laws from July 1. The laws will introduce 60-day custody limits, remote trials, and innovative sentencing like community service. Legal professionals are undergoing extensive training to familiarize themselves with the new legal framework, ensuring a smooth transition.
Today(on 28th March),The Delhi High Court has instructed the government to review a proposal for better internet in courtrooms. An emphasized need for reliable internet access within judicial premises has led to a public interest litigation. The lack of internet connectivity hinders virtual court hearings, affecting access to justice and legal processes. The government’s inaction reflects poorly on its commitment to digital infrastructure.
