Curtailment of My Free Speech: Abhijit Iyer-Mitra Opposes Newslaundry Journalists’ Defamation Plea in Delhi High Court

Abhijit Iyer-Mitra told the Delhi High Court that attempts to restrain him from posting online were a “curtailment of my freedom of expression.” The Court is hearing Newslaundry journalists’ Rs 2 crore defamation suit over alleged derogatory posts.

BREAKING: ANI Sues YouTuber Mohak Mangal for Defamation Over Explosive Extortion Allegations

ANI has filed a defamation suit against YouTuber Mohak Mangal in the Delhi High Court, accusing him of making false claims of extortion and copyright misuse. The suit also includes comedian Kunal Kamra and activist Mohammed Zubair for sharing Mangal’s video, which ANI claims harms its reputation and misuses its trademarks.

Delhi HC Slams Abhijit Iyer-Mitra Over Tweets on Newslaundry Journalists: “A Person Who Uses Such Language Should Not Be Heard”

Today, On 21st May, The Delhi High Court strongly criticised Abhijit Iyer-Mitra for his tweets against Newslaundry journalists, saying, “A person who uses such language should not be heard,” and ordered the posts to be taken down.

Defamatory Video Against BJP’s Girish Mahajan | Bombay HC Orders Takedown of Content Targeting the Minister, Restrains Future Content

The Bombay High Court ordered the removal of videos targeting BJP Minister Girish Mahajan and restrained two YouTubers from sharing similar content until the defamation case filed by Mahajan is finally resolved.

Delhi HC Judge Recuses from Nalin Kohli’s Defamation Case Against Dainik Bhaskar: “How Can I Hear It?”

Today, On 16th April, Delhi High Court Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav has recused himself from hearing BJP leader Nalin Kohli’s defamation case against Dainik Bhaskar. Kohli claims the publication falsely linked him to a fake news network targeting political figures through a sting video and report.

Defamation Case By AAP’s Satyendra Jain | Rouse Avenue Court Gives One-Week Time to BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj to File Response

The Rouse Avenue Court has given BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj one week to file her response in a defamation case. The case involves allegations made against her, and the court has allowed time for her to present her side. This development is part of ongoing legal proceedings. The court’s decision ensures both sides have an opportunity to be heard fairly.

Isha Foundation Sues for Defamation Over Nakkheeran Videos; Seeks Rs 3 Crore Damages

Isha Foundation has filed a defamation suit against Nakkheeran for publishing critical allegations against it. Seeking Rs 3 crore in damages, the case, scheduled to begin arguments in April 2025, involves claims of misconduct. The Supreme Court previously ruled that two women at the ashram are there voluntarily, prompting ongoing investigations.

Defamation Suit Against Dhruv Rathee|| “An Errant Litigant Can’t Get the Liberty of This Court”: BJP Leader Seeks Time to Correct Defective Affidavit

BJP leader Suresh Nakhua requested more time to rectify a flawed affidavit in his defamation case against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee. Rathee sought the case’s dismissal, emphasizing Nakhua’s repeated errors. The court noted procedural issues and scheduled a hearing for February 2025, awaiting clarification on the affidavit’s compliance with new legal requirements.

BREAKING | ANI Vs Wikipedia| Delhi HC Issued Summons To User Who Make ‘Defamatory’ Edits

The Delhi High Court,on Thursday(14th Nov) led by Justice Subramonium Prasad, issued summons to users accused of making defamatory edits on the ANI Wikipedia page. Following a consent order with ANI, Wikipedia agreed to serve summons confidentially without revealing user identities. The next hearing is scheduled for December 16.

Defamation Case Against Dhruv Rathee|| “Submit Corrected Affidavit”: Court Orders BJP’s Suresh Nakhua

The Saket Court raised issues with BJP leader Suresh Nakhua’s affidavit in his defamation suit against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee regarding a video from July 7. The court found it defective and ordered Nakhua to submit a revised version. The case involves allegations of defamatory claims affecting Nakhua’s reputation.