Kerala High Court bars judges from using AI tools to pass judgments or grant relief. Cites privacy, data risks, and stresses full judicial responsibility.
The Delhi High Court Today (Feb 25) refused an urgent hearing on banning DeepSeek AI, stating users can choose not to use it. The court questioned the urgency, noting similar AI platforms already exist.
The Delhi High Court Today (Feb 12) asked the central government to clarify its stance on a petition against Chinese AI company DeepSeek, which raises privacy and security concerns. Justice Gedela emphasized the risks of AI, stating, “AI is a dangerous tool in anybody’s hands…” The court postponed the hearing to February 20, allowing the government to provide a clear response.
The Ministry of Finance in India has advised employees to refrain from using AI tools like ChatGPT and DeepSeek for official tasks due to risks to government data confidentiality. This internal directive, confirmed by ministry officials, reflects a broader trend as other nations like Australia and Italy also impose similar restrictions, citing security concerns.
EXCLUSIVE | China’s AI-powered DeepSeek offers a fresh take on India’s most influential Chief Justices, from Justice P.N. Bhagwati’s PIL revolution to Justice D.Y. Chandrachud’s progressive reforms. While the title of the “best” CJI remains subjective, their landmark judgments have shaped India’s legal landscape. What does China’s AI think? Find out here!
