The Delhi High Court criticized the DDA for delaying an advocate’s rightful fees, stressing that public bodies must act honourably. The court said such conduct undermines the rule of law and damages the sanctity of the lawyer-client relationship.
The Delhi High Court ruled that no houses or families can live on the Yamuna floodplains, even if the land is claimed as a graveyard or for religious use. Calling the situation “quite disturbing”, the Court ordered fencing, eviction of occupants, and strict action against all illegal constructions.
The Supreme Court directed Delhi’s Forest Department to file a detailed report on the 185 acres meant for compensatory afforestation. Justice Surya Kant said afforestation across 18 sites would be more “environmentally and equitably” balanced than a single location.
Today, On 23rd June, In the Batla House demolition case, the Delhi High Court reserved its verdict after hearing arguments on petitions challenging DDA’s notices, as the DDA strongly opposed the pleas filed by long-time residents facing eviction.
The Delhi High Court has reserved its order on pleas filed by Batla House residents challenging demolition notices issued by the DDA. Petitioners claim their properties are legal and backed by proper documents, including affidavits.
The Delhi High Court has temporarily halted the demolitions for 11 Batla House residents, requiring them to withdraw their Supreme Court plea. The DDA opposed this, citing a Supreme Court order for demolitions in Khasra No. 279 and raising concerns about the residents’ legal actions. The DDA is accused of inadequate notice before demolitions.
The Supreme Court will hear in July a petition challenging the proposed demolition of alleged illegal structures in Okhla village. The plea raises concerns over residents’ rights and the legality of the demolition drive.
Today, On 28th May, The Supreme Court described the Delhi Ridge tree-cutting issue as “a case of institutional missteps and administrative overreach,” while letting the Delhi LG and DDA off the hook in the contempt case, citing broader public welfare considerations.
Delhi High Court has restrained DDA from taking action against Shahi Idgah for using a park during a 2024 religious event. The court cited the non-functioning waqf tribunal and scheduled the next hearing for September 10. New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has asked the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) not to take any action against […]
The Delhi High Court criticized the Delhi Government and DDA for delays in providing residential accommodations to district judges, warning of potential action if the situation persists. The court expressed frustration over repeated requests being ignored, emphasizing the urgent need for decent living conditions for judicial officers and demanding timely action from authorities.
