Former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud said the highlight of his judicial career was securing permanent commission for women in the armed forces, adding that laws designed to protect women have the power to bring meaningful and lasting change in society. Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud expressed that the highlight of his career was […]
During a heated SC hearing on Bihar’s voter roll revision, Justice Surya Kant remarked, “Our own social media websites are sufficient,” while addressing concerns of criticism from foreign media. The case highlights worries over arbitrary voter deletions and rising misinformation against the judiciary.
Prof. Mohan Gopal said the Ayodhya judgment can be challenged through a curative petition based on Ex-CJI DY Chandrachud’s remark that the very erection of the Babri Masjid was an act of desecration of a temple.
Ex-CJI D.Y. Chandrachud responded to Sanjeev Sanyal, asserting that the judiciary is not a roadblock to Viksit Bharat, while emphasizing, “Expeditious disposal of cases is the key to the preservation of the rule of law,” ensuring transparency and certainty.
Former CJI DY Chandrachud firmly dismissed allegations of bias in assigning bail cases to Justice Bela Trivedi, calling them unsubstantiated. He stressed that facts prove otherwise, as case allocation in the Supreme Court is done randomly by computer.
In Umar Khalid’s case, Ex-CJI Chandrachud highlighted that there were multiple adjournments sought by his counsel, at least seven or more, and finally the bail application was withdrawn, a fact often overlooked in debates.
Former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud urged lawyers to prioritise ethics, lifelong learning, and empathy, calling them “facilitators of justice before everything.” He also stressed gender diversity and support for young lawyers.
Former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud says retired judges can greatly contribute to legislative bodies and tribunals. He calls media “hype” a reason judges avoid such roles.
Former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud told the Joint Parliamentary Committee that the One Nation One Election Bill is not unconstitutional and does not breach the Constitution’s basic structure, despite concerns about its effect on federalism and democracy.
Former Chief Justices J.S. Khehar and D.Y. Chandrachud appeared before the Parliamentary Committee on One Nation One Election, sharing insights on legal feasibility. Their presence signals judiciary’s growing role in shaping electoral reforms.
