Jan Suraaj Party chief Prashant Kishor, leading the BPSC protest movement, was granted unconditional bail shortly after being sent to Beur Jail. Kishor’s statement, “No strength is greater than people’s strength,” resonated with supporters. The political strategist has been at the forefront of protests demanding accountability and reforms. His release marks a key moment in the ongoing agitation.
Justice G.R. Swaminathan believes that the first step towards decolonization is to understand existing laws from the perspective of our own civilization. This means linking legal systems to our cultural and historical roots. It challenges the colonial influences still present in today’s laws. Justice Swaminathan highlights the importance of interpreting laws in a way that reflects our local context for true independence.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that failing to appear in response to a proclamation under Section 82 of the CrPC is a stand-alone offence under Section 174A of the IPC. This offence remains valid even if the proclamation ceases to be in effect. The judgment came in an appeal challenging a decision by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. This clarification reinforces accountability in complying with legal proclamations.
In the Govind Pansare murder case, the Bombay High Court decided to end its monitoring of the investigation and has called for a quick trial. The court noted that the only remaining task was locating two absconding accused, which no longer required court oversight. The decision emphasizes the progress made in the case and directs that the trial proceed without further delays. The focus now shifts to completing the legal process speedily.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Section 311A of the CrPC, clarifying that arrest is not mandatory for obtaining specimen signatures during investigations. It stated that the proviso is directory, not mandatory, allowing individuals to voluntarily provide samples without being arrested. This interpretation aligns with similar provisions in the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), ensuring investigative efficiency without infringing on fundamental rights.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the legal obligation for public and private hospitals to provide free, comprehensive medical care to sexual assault survivors, including emergency treatment, diagnostics, and psychological counseling. The court established strict directives to ensure immediate access to care, warning of legal consequences for non-compliance.
![[Excise Policy] "Whatever You File, Give It to Them Also": HC Denies Early Hearing on Kejriwal's Plea in Money Laundering Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-5-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 6th December, the Delhi High Court refused to expedite the hearing for Arvind Kejriwal’s plea in a money laundering case linked to the excise policy. Kejriwal sought an earlier date than December 20, but the court denied his request, maintaining the original schedule and addressing related procedural matters regarding the Enforcement Directorate’s response.
![[BMW Hit-and-Run Case] 'Illegal Arrest': Bombay HC Rejects Accused Mihir Shah's Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-67-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 25th November, the Bombay High Court dismissed a plea by Mihir Shah and his driver, contesting their arrests in a fatal hit-and-run incident. The court upheld the legality of the arrests, rejecting claims of unlawful detention. This ruling is significant for the ongoing case following the tragic death of Kaveri Nakhwa.
![[Savarkar Defamation Case] “Your Attendance Is Necessary to Answer a Charge”: Court Orders Rahul Gandhi to Appear on December 2](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-46.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A Pune special court has summoned Rahul Gandhi to appear on December 2 regarding a defamation case filed by Satyaki Savarkar, who alleges Gandhi made false remarks about freedom fighter Vinayak Damodar Savarkar during a March 2023 speech in London. Gandhi previously missed court dates, prompting legal action from Savarkar’s representatives.
![[Malegaon Blast] "She Didn't Appear Before the Court as Instructed": Court Issues Fresh Bailable Warrant Against Pragya Singh Thakur](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-13-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A Mumbai court issued a new bailable warrant against Pragya Singh Thakur in connection with the Malegaon blast case. The decision follows Thakur’s absence from court proceedings, despite previous orders requiring her presence. The court emphasized the importance of her attendance and took action due to her continued non-compliance. Thakur is one of the accused in the 2008 Malegaon bombing case, which remains an ongoing high-profile trial.