The Delhi High Court emphasized the legal obligation for public and private hospitals to provide free, comprehensive medical care to sexual assault survivors, including emergency treatment, diagnostics, and psychological counseling. The court established strict directives to ensure immediate access to care, warning of legal consequences for non-compliance.
![[Excise Policy] "Whatever You File, Give It to Them Also": HC Denies Early Hearing on Kejriwal's Plea in Money Laundering Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-5-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 6th December, the Delhi High Court refused to expedite the hearing for Arvind Kejriwal’s plea in a money laundering case linked to the excise policy. Kejriwal sought an earlier date than December 20, but the court denied his request, maintaining the original schedule and addressing related procedural matters regarding the Enforcement Directorate’s response.
![[BMW Hit-and-Run Case] 'Illegal Arrest': Bombay HC Rejects Accused Mihir Shah's Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-67-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 25th November, the Bombay High Court dismissed a plea by Mihir Shah and his driver, contesting their arrests in a fatal hit-and-run incident. The court upheld the legality of the arrests, rejecting claims of unlawful detention. This ruling is significant for the ongoing case following the tragic death of Kaveri Nakhwa.
![[Savarkar Defamation Case] “Your Attendance Is Necessary to Answer a Charge”: Court Orders Rahul Gandhi to Appear on December 2](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-46.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A Pune special court has summoned Rahul Gandhi to appear on December 2 regarding a defamation case filed by Satyaki Savarkar, who alleges Gandhi made false remarks about freedom fighter Vinayak Damodar Savarkar during a March 2023 speech in London. Gandhi previously missed court dates, prompting legal action from Savarkar’s representatives.
![[Malegaon Blast] "She Didn't Appear Before the Court as Instructed": Court Issues Fresh Bailable Warrant Against Pragya Singh Thakur](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-13-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A Mumbai court issued a new bailable warrant against Pragya Singh Thakur in connection with the Malegaon blast case. The decision follows Thakur’s absence from court proceedings, despite previous orders requiring her presence. The court emphasized the importance of her attendance and took action due to her continued non-compliance. Thakur is one of the accused in the 2008 Malegaon bombing case, which remains an ongoing high-profile trial.
![[Bizarre Request]“My Mind is Being Controlled by A Machine,” Claims By The Petitioner: SC Rejects Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-1-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Punjab and Haryana High Court criticized an Additional Sessions Judge for prioritizing a police statement over a court testimony, leading to unjust penalties against witnesses. The Bench expressed its concern for judicial diligence and recommended further training for the judge, referring the case to the Chief Justice for appropriate administrative action.
Justice B. V. Nagarathna is a distinguished Judge of the Supreme Court of India, known for her significant contributions to jurisprudence. Born in 1962, she transitioned from the Karnataka High Court to the Supreme Court, where she is considered a role model and a potential candidate for Chief Justice, inspiring women in law.
![[Election Bribery Case] Court had Gone Beyond Jurisdiction": Kerala Govt Appeals Acquittal of BJP Leader Surendran](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-17-1.png?resize=447%2C338&ssl=1)
Today, On 16th October, the Kerala High Court stayed BJP state chief K. Surendran’s discharge in an election bribery case, responding to the state government’s appeal against a lower court’s ruling. Surendran faces accusations of intimidating a rival in the 2021 Manjeshwaram election. Further proceedings are postponed until November 8.
The Kerala High Court ruled that referring to a woman as a “prostitute” in her absence does not violate Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code, as the offense requires her presence. The court dismissed criminal proceedings, affirming that derogatory remarks made to third parties do not automatically intrude on a woman’s privacy.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a plea against Swami Rambhadracharya for alleged remarks about Scheduled Castes and Tribes. The court found no offense under relevant laws, agreeing with the special judge’s justifications. The petitioner’s appeal was rejected after thorough legal examination, affirming the previous dismissal from February 2024.