The Delhi High Court has refused to discharge TV Today Network in a criminal defamation case filed by BJP leader Ramesh Bidhuri over a 2011 Aaj Tak report, upholding the Magistrate’s order. The Court ruled that once summons are issued in a summons trial, the Magistrate cannot recall or annul the order.
The Supreme Court of India acquitted six murder suspects, criticizing the “overzealous” police investigation and highlighting that a significant number of witnesses turned hostile, including the victim’s son. The court emphasized that convictions must rely on valid evidence, not on assumptions or inadmissible statements, leading to the reversal of the Karnataka High Court’s ruling.
A Pune special MP/MLA court has approved Rahul Gandhi’s request to convert his defamation trial concerning Vinayak Savarkar from a summary to a summons format. This allows Gandhi to present detailed evidence and cross-examine witnesses, deemed necessary by the judge due to the complexity of factual and legal questions involved.
The Allahabad High Court allowed the Uttar Pradesh government’s plea to withdraw the criminal case against Brij Bhushan Singh. Singh had earlier challenged a Gonda court’s decision that rejected the state’s request to withdraw the case. The High Court’s ruling set-aside the lower court’s order, favouring the state’s stance. This decision marks a significant development in the legal proceedings against Singh.
A shocking discovery unfolded as a law clerk’s body found near a technician studio, raising suspicions of foul play. Authorities are investigating the circumstances surrounding the tragic incident, searching for clues and potential suspects. The unexpected death has left colleagues and family members in deep distress, demanding swift justice.
The Delhi High Court set aside earlier guidelines issued to trial courts regarding victim compensation. It ruled that requiring the accused or convict to submit an affidavit disclosing their assets and liabilities violates constitutional and statutory rights. The judgment emphasizes the need to balance victims’ rights with the legal protections afforded to the accused. This decision could impact the approach trial courts take in compensation-related matters.
Today, On 15th January, The Karnataka High Court heard final arguments on a petition filed by BS Yediyurappa seeking to quash the FIR against him under the POCSO Act. The FIR alleges his involvement in the sexual assault of a minor girl. The state has argued that Yediyurappa must face trial in the matter. The court’s decision on the petition is awaited.