Supreme Court Mandates Clear Charts in Criminal Judgments to Speed Up Trials

The Supreme Court has directed all trial courts to use structured charts for witnesses, documents and evidence in criminal judgments. The move aims to improve clarity, readability and faster review of cases by appellate courts.

Police Commissioner Accepts Our Demand, Strike Ends: Delhi Bar Leader Announces After Advocates’ Protest

Delhi district court lawyers withdrew their strike after Police Commissioner Satish Golcha assured that police officers will physically appear in courts to give evidence. Bar leaders said their immediate demand was met, though BNSS amendment remains a long-term goal.

All Officers Shall Go to Courts for Deposition/Evidence: Delhi Police After Lawyers Protest

Following protests by lawyers, Delhi Police has directed that all officers and personnel will physically appear in courts for deposition and evidence presentation. The directive stated, “All Police Officers/Personnel shall go to courts for deposition/evidence.”

“Gangsters Are Playing the System”: Supreme Court Slams Delay in 288 Criminal Trials in Delhi, Demands Urgent Reforms

The Supreme Court Today (July 24) raised strong concern over 288 pending gangsters trials in Delhi, with years of delay in starting evidence. It called for special fast-track courts and strict timelines to stop criminals from misusing the legal process.

“Install Biometric Checks in Courts to Tackle Bail Fraud by Fake Witnesses”: P&H High Court

The High Court mandated the adoption of biometric verification, utilizing Aadhaar card authentication, for witnesses across all courts within its jurisdiction, encompassing Haryana, Punjab, and Chandigarh. This directive seeks to curb the widespread misuse of bail procedures facilitated by counterfeit witnesses, an issue that has persisted in these regions.

[BREAKING] CJI Criticized Some HCs Require 48-Hour Notice or Age Restriction for Video-Conferencing Links

Today (25th April): Chief Justice Chandrachud criticized certain High Courts for imposing restrictions on accessing video-conferencing links, calling it a hindrance to judicial accessibility. He emphasized the operational benefits of virtual hearings and the need to remove unnecessary barriers. The judiciary’s investment in digitization is crucial for equitable access to justice.

SC: Article 20(1) Of Constitution Doesn’t Bar Retrospective Application of Procedural Changes in Criminal Trial

Supreme Court Affirms: Article 20(1) Doesn’t Restrict Retrospective Application of Procedural Changes in Criminal Trials In a pivotal judgment, the Supreme Court has clarified that procedural changes in criminal trials, introduced after an offence is committed, are not barred from retrospective application by Article 20(1) of the Constitution. This article prohibits the imposition of ex […]