“Wife Is Not an Accused”: Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan HC Order Forcing Rape Accused’s US-Based Wife to Stay in India

The Supreme Court set aside a Rajasthan High Court order that required a rape accused’s wife, who lives and works in the US, to remain in India. The Court held that imposing conditions on a non-party violates procedure and accepted the accused’s undertaking to attend hearings via video-conferencing.

Court Grants Indrani Mukerjea Partial Access to “Unrelied” Evidence in Sheena Bora Murder Case

A Mumbai special court has partly allowed Indrani Mukerjea’s request for documents collected during the Sheena Bora murder probe but not included in the chargesheet. The judge said giving access to non-confidential records was “in the interest of justice.”

2019 Gadchiroli Blast: Charges Framed Against Four Remaining Accused After Supreme Court’s Order

A special NIA court has framed charges against the four remaining accused in the 2019 Gadchiroli Naxalite blast case, which killed 15 police personnel and a driver, following directions issued by the Supreme Court of India.

“He Can Raise the 17A Issue Before Trial Court”: Supreme Court Refuses Relief to Lalu in Land-for-Jobs Case

Supreme Court declines to intervene in Lalu Prasad Yadav’s plea on land-for-jobs scam. ASG SV Raju urges costs, says, “Big pockets file multiple applications.”

“Even a Novice Wouldn’t Miss It”: Senthil Balaji Seeks Removal of SC’s Harsh Remarks in Job Scam Case

Former TN Minister Senthil Balaji urges Supreme Court to expunge critical observations from 2022 verdict, citing threat to fair trial. Claims strong language may bias ongoing proceedings.

Allahabad High Court Rejects Patanjali’s Rs 273.5 Cr GST Penalty Appeal, Says No Criminal Trial Needed

Patanjali Ayurved’s plea against a Rs 273.5 crore GST penalty was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. The Court ruled that such penalties are civil in nature and don’t need a criminal trial.

[Rape Case] “Was Illiterate Victim’s Understanding of Settlement Verified?”: SC Questions

Yesterday, On 5th November, The Supreme Court quashed a Gujarat High Court decision that accepted an ‘amicable settlement’ in a rape case without ensuring the illiterate victim understood it. The Court emphasized the need for proper verification and directed the High Court to remand the case, ensuring the victim’s comprehension of legal agreements is confirmed.

“If Documents Cannot Be Made Available to the Accused After Filing the Chargesheet, Does It Not Violate His Right Under Article 21?”: SC Asks ED

Today(4th September),The Supreme Court of India discussed the accused’s right to access documents collected by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) during investigations. Justices Oka, Amanullah, and Masih questioned whether denying such access on technical grounds violates constitutional rights under Article 21.

2017 Actress Assault Case | Supreme Court Seeks Kerala Govt’s Response on Third Bail Plea of ‘Pulsar’ Suni

Today(12th August), the Supreme Court sought the Kerala government’s response on the third bail plea of Sunil NS, known as ‘Pulsar’ Suni, an accused in the 2017 Kerala actress assault case involving actor Dileep. The court also stayed the High Court’s order for Suni to deposit Rs. 25,000 as costs.

Defamation Case Against Union Minister Smriti Irani|| Allahabad High Court Dismisses the Plea of Shooter Vartika Singh

Last week: The Allahabad High Court dismissed a defamation case against Union Minister Smriti Irani, filed by international shooter Vartika Singh. The court emphasized the seriousness of summoning in a criminal trial and found insufficient grounds to proceed under Section 499/500 of the IPC for defamation. (Word count: 46)