The Kerala High Court expressed strong doubts over a plea seeking to restrain the release of a Malayalam film allegedly inspired by the Venjaramoodu mass murder case. The Court questioned how a creative artwork could interfere with a fair criminal trial and agreed to hear the matter further.
A Delhi court has allowed forensic examination of the Unnao gang rape survivor’s voice sample to verify disputed audio and video recordings. The court clarified that the CFSL report will only aid the trial and its evidentiary value will be assessed later.
The Supreme Court held that courts must use Section 311 CrPC only when the evidence is absolutely necessary to reach the truth. It set aside the High Court order allowing examination of a minor witness at a very late stage, saying it would delay the trial and prejudice the accused.
The Supreme Court set aside a Rajasthan High Court order that required a rape accused’s wife, who lives and works in the US, to remain in India. The Court held that imposing conditions on a non-party violates procedure and accepted the accused’s undertaking to attend hearings via video-conferencing.
A Mumbai special court has partly allowed Indrani Mukerjea’s request for documents collected during the Sheena Bora murder probe but not included in the chargesheet. The judge said giving access to non-confidential records was “in the interest of justice.”
A special NIA court has framed charges against the four remaining accused in the 2019 Gadchiroli Naxalite blast case, which killed 15 police personnel and a driver, following directions issued by the Supreme Court of India.
Supreme Court declines to intervene in Lalu Prasad Yadav’s plea on land-for-jobs scam. ASG SV Raju urges costs, says, “Big pockets file multiple applications.”
Former TN Minister Senthil Balaji urges Supreme Court to expunge critical observations from 2022 verdict, citing threat to fair trial. Claims strong language may bias ongoing proceedings.
Patanjali Ayurved’s plea against a Rs 273.5 crore GST penalty was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. The Court ruled that such penalties are civil in nature and don’t need a criminal trial.
Yesterday, On 5th November, The Supreme Court quashed a Gujarat High Court decision that accepted an ‘amicable settlement’ in a rape case without ensuring the illiterate victim understood it. The Court emphasized the need for proper verification and directed the High Court to remand the case, ensuring the victim’s comprehension of legal agreements is confirmed.
