The Supreme Court held that continuing criminal proceedings after divorce, without specific allegations, only prolongs bitterness and burdens the justice system. The ruling came while quashing an FIR against a man and his family in a matrimonial dispute.
Kerala High Court slams police brutality, stating “custodial torture is the worst crime in a civilised society” and making it clear that lack of official sanction can’t be used to shield delinquent police officers from prosecution. The Kerala High Court ruled that the absence of government sanction cannot excuse police officers from accountability for custodial […]
The Supreme Court of India reinstated a woman judicial officer in Rajasthan, emphasizing that increased female representation in the judiciary enhances decision-making quality and promotes gender equality. The court found her removal during probation unjustified and highlighted how more women judges could inspire confidence among women seeking justice while challenging gender stereotypes.
The Supreme Court of India has raised concerns over delays in uploading High Court judgments, ordering all High Courts to report on cases decided after January 1, 2024, by July 21, 2025. This follows complaints about excessive delays and the need for accountability regarding judges’ performance and the credibility of the justice system.
The Bombay High Court condemned police for copy-pasting witness statements, labeling it a “dangerous culture” that threatens justice. The court emphasized the need for independent recording of statements to maintain investigation integrity. It urged the Maharashtra government to implement strict guidelines to ensure fairness in serious criminal cases, vital for public trust.
![[BREAKING] Supreme Court Digital Services Affected Due to National Government Cloud Disruption](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/image-312.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court upheld the life sentences of five convicts from a 2002 murder case, rejecting their appeal on procedural flaws and witness inconsistencies. The court emphasized the importance of eyewitness accounts, asserting that minor contradictions do not undermine their credibility. This decision reaffirms the commitment to maintaining societal order and justice.