The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against a private hospital and a doctor in a medical negligence case, holding that the surgical mop left during a C-section was unintentional and bereft of the necessary mens rea to face criminal trial.
Today, on 9th December, A Delhi court asked Sonia Gandhi and the Delhi Police to reply to a petition seeking registration of an FIR. The plea claims her name appeared on electoral rolls before she became an Indian citizen, demanding an inquiry.
Jharkhand High Court gave major relief to Rahul Gandhi by striking down a Chaibasa court’s cognisance order. The Court held the proceedings were “illegal and procedurally defective.”
Today, on 11th September, The Delhi Court has rejected a plea seeking an FIR against Sonia Gandhi regarding her name being included in the voters’ list before acquiring citizenship. The court dismissed the petition, closing the matter legally.
Today, on 10th September, Pre-Citizenship Voters’ List Entry row reached Delhi Court as a plea sought FIR against Sonia Gandhi. The Court, led by ACMM Vaibhav Chaurasia, has reserved its order on the matter after hearing petitioner Vikas Tripathi.
Plea in Delhi court seeks FIR against Sonia Gandhi over her inclusion in the electoral roll before she became an Indian citizen. The petition questions, “How her name got included in the electoral roll in the New Delhi constituency.”
The Delhi High Court reserved its order on the maintainability of the Popular Front of India’s petition, where the organisation has challenged the Centre’s decision imposing a five-year ban under the anti-terror law.
The Popular Front of India (PFI) has filed a petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) money laundering proceedings. The Delhi High Court has scheduled the next hearing in the case for November 17, 2025.
Today, On 25th August, In the Covid drugs case, the Delhi High Court refused to stay trial court proceedings against Gautam Gambhir, observing that “once you get a stay, you stop appearing, the investigation stops, nothing survives and the whole goes away.”
The Supreme Court ruled that courts can permit amendments in criminal complaints if they don’t harm the accused. It reaffirmed that procedural rules must serve justice, not obstruct it.
