No Withdrawal of Cases Against Lawmakers Without High Court Leave: Supreme Court Dismisses Bal Kumar Patel’s Appeals

The Supreme Court of India dismissed criminal appeals filed by Bal Kumar Patel, also known as Raj Kumar, refusing to quash ongoing proceedings. The Court stressed, ‘No Withdrawal of Cases Against Lawmakers Without High Court Leave,’ upholding the requirement.

Despite Supreme Court Approval, HCs Still Reluctant to Appoint Ad-Hoc Judges to Clear Criminal Case Backlog

Despite the Supreme Court’s approval nearly five months ago, High Courts across the country remain hesitant to appoint ad-hoc judges, delaying efforts to reduce the mounting backlog of criminal cases pending before them.

Supreme Court Slams Delay: Urges Centre to Clear Judges’ Appointments Amid 7 Lakh Pending Cases

The Supreme Court of India expressed concern over nearly 7 lakh pending criminal appeals across high courts, especially noting the severe under-staffing in the Allahabad High Court, which currently operates with only 79 of its sanctioned 160 judges. The court urged the central government to expedite judicial appointments for timely justice delivery.

Supreme Court Slams Jharkhand HC for Delay in Criminal Verdicts, Seeks Report from All High Courts: “This Cannot Be Allowed to Happen”

Today, On 5th May, The Supreme Court strongly criticised the Jharkhand High Court for delaying verdicts in criminal cases and directed all High Courts to submit status reports, stating, “This cannot be allowed to happen in a judicial system.”

Supreme Court Questions Lawyer For Adjournments: ‘Clients Behind Bars for Too Long’

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on Thursday (23rd Jan) expressed its dissatisfaction when a lawyer requested an adjournment in a criminal case. The Bench, comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra, highlighted the prolonged incarceration of the lawyer’s client, emphasizing the need for prompt justice.

Supreme Court Suggests Ad Hoc Judges for High Courts to Tackle Pending Criminal Appeals

The Supreme Court proposed appointing ad hoc judges under Article 224A to tackle the backlog of criminal appeals in high courts. Highlighting the severe delays, the court emphasized the need for these judges to work alongside permanent judges. The Chief Justice urged revising the 2021 guidelines to enable prompt appointments, ensuring efficient case resolution and addressing the plight of convicts.

2002 Godhra Train Burning Case| Supreme Court to Hear the Matter on February 13

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing for February 13 regarding the appeals filed by the Gujarat government and several convicts involved in the 2002 Godhra train burning case. The bench, consisting of Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Aravind Kumar, has made it clear that no adjournment will be allowed on the next hearing date.

“Courts Must Play an Active Role in Trials, Not Merely Passive Recorders”: SC Clarifies Public Prosecutor and Trial Judge Roles in Cross-Examination

The Supreme Court of India highlighted the need for active participation of courts in trials, especially when public prosecutors neglect their duties. The court stressed the importance of thorough cross-examinations by public prosecutors to uncover the truth. Emphasizing the duty of courts to ascertain truth, it criticized prosecutorial and judicial failures.