Patna High Court Quashes Cancellation Of SI Candidature; Says Hiding Trivial Family Dispute Case Not Fatal

The Patna High Court set aside the cancellation of a selected Police Sub-Inspector’s candidature for not disclosing a pending criminal case, holding that the case arose from a trivial family property dispute, proceedings were stayed, and the candidate was 23, so the non-disclosure could not be treated as fatal.

Patna High Court Cancels Murder Accused’s Bail; Refers Naugachia Sessions Judge To Chief Justice For Action

The Patna High Court has cancelled the bail granted by a Naugachia Sessions Judge to Tunna Yadav @ Tuntun Yadav, accused of shooting a man dead in a weekly market, holding that the order ignored the High Court’s earlier rejection and wrongly recorded that he had no criminal history, and has referred the judicial officer’s conduct to the Chief Justice.

Accused Cannot Be Kept In Jail Solely On Account Of Criminal Antecedents If Bail Is Otherwise Made Out: Allahabad High Court

Granting bail to a man accused of sending an email with derogatory remarks against the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, the Allahabad High Court held that if a case for bail is otherwise made out, an accused cannot be kept incarcerated solely because of his criminal antecedents, where those antecedents stand explained. The man had been in custody for about two and a half years with the trial moving slowly. The allegations are untested.

You Have A Glorious History: Supreme Court Remarks On NDPS Accused’s Criminal Antecedents Bail Plea

The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of an SLP seeking regular bail in an NDPS Act and Arms Act case after making sharp observations on the accused’s criminal antecedents during the hearing, remarking on the petitioner’s extensive criminal history before permitting withdrawal of the plea.

Complete Disclosure in Government Jobs Is Mandatory, Not a Formality: Supreme Court on Hiding Criminal Cases During Recruitment

The Supreme Court of India ruled that full and honest disclosure in government job applications is a basic requirement rooted in fairness, integrity and public trust. The Court held that hiding pending criminal cases cannot be excused later, even if the candidate is eventually acquitted.

‘Complete Disclosure Is Not a Formality’: Supreme Court Says Honesty Is Mandatory for Government Jobs

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that full and truthful disclosure in government job applications is a basic requirement based on fairness, integrity and public trust. The Court held that hiding criminal cases undermines the recruitment process and sympathy cannot override the law.

“Disclose Your Crimes Before Seeking Freedom”: Supreme Court Tells High Courts to Tighten Bail Rules

Supreme Court urges all High Courts to frame rules mandating disclosure of prior criminal cases in bail applications. Also expunges harsh remarks against a judge, calling them “uncalled for” and passed without hearing him.

“Complete Anarchy, How Can Supreme Court Registry Do That?”: SC Slammed its Registry

On Tuesday(16th July),The Supreme Court rebuked its registry for directing a case involving a service dispute and individuals with criminal histories to the Lok Adalat. The case involved an appeal challenging the rejection of a constable position due to nondisclosure of criminal prosecution, upheld by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in August 2019.

Bombay HC Seeks Fresh Psychiatric and Psychological Report for Convicted Man Who Killed Mother, Ate Her Organs

The Bombay High Court seeks new psychiatric, psychological, and Probation Welfare Officer’s reports for Sunil Rama Kuchkoravi, convicted of killing his mother and desecrating her organs in Kolhapur in 2017. The court is concurrently reviewing the state’s petition to confirm his death sentence and Kuchkoravi’s appeal against it.

BREAKING| Gangster Act Case | Ex- Samajwadi Party Legislator Kamlesh Pathak’s Bail Plea Rejected by Supreme Court

Today(on 20th May), The Supreme Court rejected bail for ex-Samajwadi Party legislator Kamlesh Pathak under Uttar Pradesh’s Gangster Act due to his extensive criminal record. Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish C Sharma emphasized his influence in the region and the severity of the charges. Pathak’s previous bail grants in murder cases did not apply to the Gangster Act charges.