In Umar Khalid’s case, Ex-CJI Chandrachud highlighted that there were multiple adjournments sought by his counsel, at least seven or more, and finally the bail application was withdrawn, a fact often overlooked in debates.
Justice Vikram Nath has urged the Delhi High Court to start live-streaming its proceedings, calling it the premier institution of the country. He reminded that judges had no objections and asked to be invited when live-streaming begins.
The Coordination Committee of All District Courts Bar Associations of Delhi will take a final decision on the ongoing lawyers’ strike against the LG’s notification allowing police to give virtual testimony. Advocates and court staff await the outcome as the strike enters its fifth day.
The Delhi High Court Bar Association has demanded withdrawal of the LG’s notification allowing police officers to testify from stations via video conferencing. Lawyers warn it endangers fair trial rights and judicial integrity.
The Bar Council of India has demanded withdrawal of Delhi LG’s August 13 notification, saying “evidence can only be recorded in the court in the physical presence of the witness.” Lawyers continue strike, calling the order “arbitrary.”
Today, On 11th August, The Supreme Court criticised the growing “trend among lawyers to critique judges of HC and trial courts,” noting that in political cases, there is often an assumption that justice cannot be delivered in the High Court.
Gujarat High Court slammed the police for their negligence after a judgment was passed against a man who had died years ago. The court found the deceased guilty of his wife’s murder due to police lapses.
Today, On 1st August, Delhi High Court directs Centre to re-examine its decision on Udaipur Files, asking, “Where is your authority to recommend cuts?” The court questioned the legal basis behind the advisory to revise the film’s content.
Madras High Court criticised media channels for running slanderous campaigns against the judiciary for profit. Emphasising judicial respect, it said, “In the name of freedom of speech and expression, one cannot condone acts of contempt.”
The Supreme Court rejected a request to shift the Waqf Act case from Delhi High Court, remarking, “Petitions are nowadays being filed only for the newspapers” and questioned the urgency behind rushing to court.
