Despite an amicable settlement, the Gujarat High Court imposed Rs 25,000 costs on a man for uploading his wife’s obscene images on social media. The Court cited his serious misconduct as a husband while quashing the FIR.
Supreme Court orders no badminton or basketball courts at historic Gumti site. Monument to be preserved, beautified, and free from commercial misuse.
A Delhi court dismissed Satyendar Jain’s defamation plea against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj, saying her remarks echoed ED’s official tweet. The court warned ED against spreading misleading or sensational content.
Madras High Court slams sexually inappropriate teaser of Bad Girl, calling it harmful to children. Court directs MeitY to ensure its urgent removal from YouTube.
Supreme Court slams ex-superintendent of Bihar women’s home for alleged sexual exploitation of inmates. Cancels her bail, saying her actions “shook the conscience of the court.”
Madras HC slams police for inaction, saying FIR alone isn’t enough. Judge orders suspension and disciplinary action for eight years of negligence. Chennai: On July 15, the Madras High Court has come down strongly on the Tamil Nadu police for their careless handling of a serious theft case. The Court directed the Director General of […]
Today, On 10th July, OLA has appealed to the Karnataka High Court, arguing that the state’s ban on bike taxis infringes on the fundamental right to conduct trade under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, as upheld by a single bench ruling.
Today, On 4th July, In the bike taxi appeal, Ola told the Karnataka High Court it was “seeking registration under the MV Act only,” stressing that no policy existed and the State ignored Court directions and their earlier representation.
The Allahabad High Court prohibited bar associations from charging Rs 500 for photo identification, deeming it illegal and a hindrance to justice access. The Court emphasized that unnecessary fees and procedures must be eliminated. It ordered that affidavits sworn before a notary be accepted without defects, promoting a smoother legal process.
The Bombay High Court has ordered a fertility centre to preserve the semen of a deceased 21-year-old to assist his mother in continuing the family lineage. Despite his consent to discard it after death, legal and ethical issues under the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act are being examined. A hearing is scheduled for July 30.
