The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the suo motu criminal contempt case against advocate Mahesh Tiwari after he apologised for his heated exchange with Justice Rajesh Kumar. The Court said its shoulders were broad enough and adopted a lenient view.
The Supreme Court of India warned against careless dependence on artificial intelligence after fake precedents and misquoted judgments surfaced, stressing judicial integrity and professional responsibility. Surya Kant observed that unchecked AI use in pleadings risks credibility, urging lawyers to.
The Supreme Court of India remarked during a bail hearing that Vanuatu was not a country, questioning accused’s origin as Siddhartha Dave cited client’s nationality. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria examined IPC charges carefully.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court condemned the use of the term “bouncer” by private security agencies, stating it incites fear and is inappropriate in a civilised society. The Court emphasized that security personnel should foster safety, not intimidation, underscoring the need for better training and regulation of such agencies to uphold public safety.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the sanctity of the Indian Parliament, stating that its breach should not be trivialized or compared to the sacrifices of martyrs like Bhagat Singh. The court questioned the application of the stringent UAPA law, urging the Delhi Police to justify its use in this case.
