The Supreme Court said that a shocking judicial order can seriously damage public trust in the institution. The bench made the remark while hearing a petition challenging directions asking the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal’s in-charge chairman to step aside.
The Supreme Court agreed to revisit the legal test for bail under the UAPA while hearing Umar Khalid’s case, sending the issue to a larger bench. The move comes amid conflicting rulings on bail standards in UAPA cases.
The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the Bombay High Court’s decision to proceed with criminal contempt against advocate Nilesh C. Ojha. It said sensationalising cases and casting reckless aspersions undermines judicial independence and breaches advocate discipline standards.
The Kerala High Court said judicial officers remain impartial and are not influenced by films or media while deciding cases. It stated this while hearing an appeal to halt Malayalam film Kaalam Paranja Kadha linked to Venjaramoodu murder.
Delhi High Court Says Court Must Not Ignore Real Human Consequences, Quashes POCSO FIR Prioritising Welfare of Mother and Child. The Court said when law fails lived reality, a young mother and child’s welfare must be paramount.
Supreme Court Justice B.V. Nagarathna said judges must honour their oath and judicial dharma even when unpopular decisions risk their elevation or extensions. She stressed that judicial review must balance transformative constitutionalism with the basic structure through courts.
The Delhi High Court refused to restrict media coverage of the Dwarka SUV crash, emphasising that freedom of the press cannot be curbed. It said no court can issue a complete gag order unless a genuine grievance is established.
The Allahabad High Court criticised CJM for taking cognizance of a theft chargesheet after the limitation period and then defending it by saying such scrutiny is not usually done in Uttar Pradesh, calling her approach “taking her judicial service very lightly.”
The Supreme Court expressed concern over a growing trend of judges issuing multiple orders just before retirement, questioning judicial discipline. Calling it an unfortunate trend, the Court likened last-minute orders to a batter hitting sixes in final over.
Today, On 24th September, The Delhi High Court rejected a plea seeking the use of ballot papers instead of EVMs for elections. The court noted that the Supreme Court has already put a final seal on the matter, ending the dispute.
