The Mumbai Bench of the NCLT admitted SBI’s application seeking personal insolvency proceedings against Reliance Group Chairman Anil Ambani. The Tribunal appointed a Resolution Professional and directed issuance of a public notice inviting creditor claims, marking a major development in the insolvency process.
The Bombay High Court granted industrialist Anil Ambani interim protection from prosecution and penalties in a tax-evasion case while admitting his petition challenging provisions of the Black Money Act. Ambani contends that certain provisions of the law are unconstitutional and violate the Constitution of India.
The Supreme Court quashed SEBI and SAT orders against Reliance Industries in the Reliance Petroleum trading case, setting aside allegations of fraudulent market practices, directing refund of Rs 250 crore deposited during proceedings and ending the prolonged legal battle arising from 2007 stock market transactions.
The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court quashed criminal proceedings and summons issued against Wipro chairman Azim Premji and senior company officials in an alleged labour law violation case linked to the company’s Ghaziabad office, while allowing their petition challenging the prosecution proceedings.
A Singapore court sentenced Byju’s founder Byju Raveendran to six months’ imprisonment for contempt over alleged non-compliance with disclosure orders, while directing payment of legal costs and ownership documents, though Raveendran denied wrongdoing, described the ruling as procedural and announced plans to appeal against it.
The Supreme Court agreed to consider Reliance Industries Limited’s fresh request for conciliation in the Krishna-Godavari Basin gas migration dispute with the Central government, observing that an amicable settlement would be welcomed and the appeal could be disposed of if both sides successfully resolve the matter.
The Bombay High Court ruled in favour of Sun Pharma in a trademark dispute over Pantocid. The court restrained Zawadi Healthcare from using Pantozed, citing risk of confusion in medicines.
Razorpay sued PayU in Delhi High Court alleging its IPL 2025 founders campaign was copied; Justice Jyoti Singh denied interim relief and adjourned hearing to March 30, after examining similarities in ads.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, ruled that any person aggrieved by an order of the National Company Law Tribunal may obtain its certified copy to file an appeal, even if they were not a party to the original proceedings.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed Jindal Poly Films Limited’s appeal challenging the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) order admitting a shareholder class action petition and directing issuance of public notice under the Companies Act, 2013, affirming continuation of class action proceedings.
