The Supreme Court ruled that homebuyers can approach consumer forums for compensation over delayed possession even after taking flat possession. The Court set aside the NCDRC order and held that arbitration clauses cannot prevent buyers from seeking remedies against real estate developers for deficient services.
The Darjeeling District Consumer Commission has directed Amazon Seller Services and a seller to pay Rs 4.68 lakh compensation to a customer over delivery of the wrong camera model. The ruling highlights e-commerce platform liability and questions the intermediary defence used by online marketplaces.
The Jalandhar Consumer Commission directed a restaurant to pay Rs 15,000 compensation to a lawyer after finding that a mandatory service charge of Rs 151.53 was added without consent. The forum held that such automatic charges amount to an unfair trade practice.
The Pathanamthitta Consumer Commission directed KSBC to compensate a customer for charging more than the printed MRP on a beer bottle. Holding the practice to be an unfair trade practice and deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act, the Commission awarded refund, compensation, and costs totaling Rs 25,000.
The Puducherry Consumer Commission held a restaurant guilty of deficiency in service after a customer found a dead fly in a plate of biryani. The Commission ordered compensation for mental distress and directed the restaurant to provide ten plates of fresh Hyderabadi chicken biryani free of cost.
A District Consumer Commission directed FirstCry to compensate a customer after finding that it arbitrarily cancelled an order, withheld payment, and labelled the customer a “fraud user” without inquiry or due process. The Commission ordered refund with interest and compensation for mental distress.
The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has imposed penalties on PhysicsWallah and McAfee Software India Pvt Ltd for allegedly using dark patterns on their digital platforms. The regulator said these practices misled consumers and unfairly influenced their purchasing decisions
The Central Consumer Protection Authority imposed a Rs 7 lakh penalty on Vajiram and Ravi IAS Study Centre for allegedly publishing misleading UPSC result advertisements, holding that the institute failed to disclose crucial details about courses attended by successful candidates featured in its promotional campaigns.
The District Consumer Commission at Bhojpur Ara held North Central Railway and the Railway Board liable for deficiency in service after passengers with confirmed berths were forced to travel standing, directing refund with interest, compensation of Rs 20,000 and litigation expenses of Rs 15,000.
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-VIII (Central), Delhi held Capricorn Transport Services liable for deficiency in service after a hired bus broke down and delayed a marriage Barat. The court awarded Rs.50,000 compensation for the inconvenience caused.
