The Supreme Court of India has ruled that real estate developers must obtain both a completion certificate and a fire safety clearance before offering possession of a flat, deeming it illegal to do otherwise. This landmark decision reinforces homebuyers’ rights by ensuring developers are accountable for securing all necessary approvals.
The Supreme Court ruling ensures no coercive action by banks or builders against NCR home buyers for EMI payments. Home buyers, affected by illegal loan disbursements, sought relief after the Delhi High Court dismissed their petitions. The decision is expected to impact the NCR’s real estate landscape and reflects the judiciary’s concern for home buyers.
The Supreme Court directed Mercedes to refund Rs. 36 lakh to M/s Controls and Switchgear Company Limited for selling a defective car. The court upheld the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, citing the discomfort and inconvenience caused to the respondent and the lack of evidence from Mercedes to support its claims.
The Apex Court suggested Today (May 14th) a review of its 1996 ruling regarding the application of the Consumer Protection Act to medical professionals. Previously the court had determined that services provided by doctors fall under the Act if payment is involved. Court noted no legislative intention to include professionals within the Act’s scope. Hence, they proposed reconsidering the decision and referred the matter to the CJI.
The Delhi High Court rejected a plea to extend parole for a convict serving a 182-year prison sentence in a graft case linked to 344 complaints from home buyers. The court emphasized that parole is a privilege, not to be extended indefinitely for settlement efforts. The petitioner’s appeals were dismissed due to alleged misappropriation of funds.
The Supreme Court on Thursday has been presented with a plea challenging the inclusion of advocate services under the ambit of the Consumer Protection Act. This case, represented by the Bar of Indian Lawyers, has sparked a significant debate on the nature of legal services and their classification as a consumer service. Also Read- Supreme […]
