War Yields Nothing: Justice Gavai’s Powerful Message After Pahalgam Attack Sparks National Reflection

Justice B.R. Gavai’s remarks after the Pahalgam attack emphasize peace and dialogue over war, reinforcing the judiciary’s commitment to constitutional values. His call for restraint over retaliation reflects India’s tradition of non-violence, embodying the principles of Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. Gavai advocates for civil liberties amidst rising tensions.

CJI Sanjiv Khanna’s Notable Judgments: From RTI to Waqf Amendment Act & Article 370 Explained

Justice Sanjiv Khanna, who served on over 480 benches, delivered significant rulings on crucial legal and social issues, including the RTI, Waqf Amendment Act, and Article 370, shaping India’s judicial landscape.

Centre Defends Waqf Act in Supreme Court, Says Religious Practices Remain Untouched

The Centre informed the Supreme Court that the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 enhances transparency in managing waqf properties without disrupting Muslim religious practices. The law aligns with constitutional values and does not infringe on fundamental rights. The government urged dismissal of petitions challenging its legality, asserting its constitutionality and public interest benefits.

Kapil Sibal Responds to VP Dhankhar’s Remark : “Constitution Is Supreme”

Kapil Sibal responded to Vice President Dhankhar’s remark that “Parliament is supreme,” stating that “Constitution is supreme.” He highlighted that neither Parliament nor the Executive has more power than the Constitution, stressing the importance of the Constitution in guiding the country’s laws and governance.

Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan on Judicial Appointments Amid Justice Varma Controversy: ‘Govt. Trying to Take Control’

Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan has alleged that the government is attempting to control judicial appointments. He claimed that the Justice Varma controversy is being used as a tool to interfere with the judiciary. Bhushan stressed that the collegium system must remain independent to ensure fair appointments. His remarks have sparked fresh debate on judicial autonomy and executive influence.

Retired Justice S Muralidhar Criticizes Anti-Conversion Laws in India, Calling Them “Anti-Choice”

Senior Advocate and former Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court, Dr. S Muralidhar, recently expressed strong concerns about India’s anti-conversion laws. Speaking at an ADF India panel discussion on February 28, he highlighted how these laws undermine personal freedom and choice.

Samvidhan Park at Nagpur University Likely to Be Inaugurated by Future CJI Justice Bhushan Gavai

Nagpur University plans to complete the long-delayed Samvidhan Park by March, aiming for its inauguration by Justice Bhushan Gavai, soon to be Chief Justice of India. The park honors Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and includes significant structures like a statue, replicas of the Supreme Court and Parliament, and an amphitheater.

Madras HC Grants Bail to Rangarajan Narasimhan in Two FIRs Over Video Allegedly Involving Deputy CM Udhayanidhi Stalin

The Madras High Court granted bail to temple activist Rangarajan Narasimhan in two cases, including one involving a secretly recorded phone conversation. The court found inadequate grounds for custodial interrogation and noted that derogatory remarks against women did not meet legal harassment definitions. Narasimhan must avoid contacting certain individuals and delete offensive content.

Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge Question Rejection of Justices Nariman and KM Joseph for NHRC Chief in Dissent Note

Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi criticized the selection process for NHRC chairperson, finding it flawed and lacking consensus. They proposed Justices Rohinton Nariman and Kuttiyil Joseph for the role, emphasizing inclusivity. Despite their dissent, Justice V. Ramasubramanian was appointed as chairperson, raising concerns about fairness and representation within the NHRC.

“Places of Worship Act Not Violate Any Fundamental Rights Under The Constitution”: RJD Member Manoj Kumar Jha Filed Intervention Petition Before Hearing In SC

RJD Member Manoj Kumar Jha filed an intervention petition in the Supreme Court, asserting that the Places of Worship Act, 1991, does not violate constitutional rights and is essential for preserving India’s secular values. The Act protects places of worship as they existed on August 15, 1947, amidst increasing sectarian tensions.