Supreme Court To Review Bihar Prohibition Law: Validity Of Section 58 On Collector’s Confiscation Powers Under Challenge

The Supreme Court has agreed to examine the constitutional validity of Section 58 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, which empowers District Collectors to confiscate vehicles in liquor cases. The move comes after Bihar challenged a Patna High Court ruling that quashed the confiscation and auction of a seized SUV.

PMLA Amendments Challenged In Supreme Court | “Section 17A Can Protect the Honest, But Also the Dishonest”: Justice Nagarathna

Supreme Court hears challenge to Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, raising concerns over misuse. Justice Nagarathna warns: “It can protect honest officers — or dishonest ones.”

PMLA Under Fire: 13 Hard-Hitting Questions Raised in Supreme Court Review

Review petitioners have challenged the Supreme Court’s 2022 PMLA verdict by raising 13 key constitutional questions. The top court will first decide if these petitions are even maintainable.

Bombay High Court Declares UAPA Constitutionally Valid, Rejects Challenge by Elgar Parishad Noticee

The Bombay High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), dismissing a petition by Anil Babura Baile, linked to the Elgar Parishad case. The court concluded that the law’s provisions are constitutional despite criticisms regarding misuse to suppress dissent.

Special Bombay HC Bench to Rehear Maratha Quota Petitions from July 18

The Bombay High Court will resume hearings on challenges to the 2024 Maratha reservation law starting July 18, 2025. This law grants reservations in jobs and education to the Maratha community. A special three-judge bench will review all arguments anew, maintaining an interim order on admissions and jobs until a final verdict.

Supreme Court’s Observation: “No Contempt If Parliament, State Legislature Simply Make Laws”

The Supreme Court stated that no law made by Parliament or a state legislature can be termed contempt of court. Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma made this remark while deciding a 2012 contempt plea.

Delhi HC Questions LG’s Power to Order Social Media Takedowns – Centre Asked to Respond

The Delhi High Court has requested responses from the Lieutenant Governor and Central Government regarding a petition that challenges an order empowering police to issue takedown notices for online content. The case raises concerns about potential misuse and violations of free speech. The next hearing is scheduled for September 17.

Madras High Court Slams Claim of Overruling SC Verdict, Stays TN Law on VC Appointments

The Madras High Court upheld its interim stay on Tamil Nadu legislation altering the Governor’s authority to appoint Vice-Chancellors, asserting potential unconstitutionality. It refuted claims of interfering with a Supreme Court decision, emphasizing judicial duty and the necessity of addressing unconstitutional laws without delay, reinforcing commitments to justice and constitutional integrity.

Kerala Government Approaches Supreme Court Against Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Says It May Harm Muslim Community’s Rights

The Kerala government has filed a petition against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, expressing fears it may discriminate against Muslims regarding waqf property management. It seeks intervention in ongoing Supreme Court challenges, citing concerns over constitutional rights and the potential negative impact on Muslim community assets and affairs amidst support for the amendment from BJP-ruled states.

Madras HC Hears Plea to Stop 12 TN Laws Removing Governor’s Role in VC Appointments

A PIL in the Madras High Court challenges 12 Tamil Nadu laws that transfer Vice-Chancellor appointment powers from the Governor to the State. The petitioner claims these laws violate UGC norms and constitutional regulations. The court will review the petition on May 21, 2025, considering the validity and potential interim orders.