The Supreme Court of India affirmed that businesses have a fundamental right to shut down under Article 19(1)(g), adhering to labor laws. If the State does not respond within 60 days, closure is automatically approved. The ruling emphasized that employers must show valid reasons beyond financial hardship to justify shutdowns, ensuring workers’ rights are protected.
Senior Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi weighed in on the controversy surrounding comedian Kunal Kamra, criticizing the Maharashtra government’s crackdown on satire. Taking to his social media platform ‘X’, Singhvi remarked, “Maharashtra politics now has a new crime—comedy!” He condemned the vandalism, threats, and calls for an apology, highlighting how satire seems to offend more than scams. His statement has reignited the debate on freedom of speech and the growing intolerance towards political humor in India.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a minor’s passport application cannot be denied due to her parents’ divorce and the father’s refusal to provide a No Objection Certificate. The court stated that the right to travel abroad is a fundamental right, emphasizing the need for fair processes in such cases.
Today, On 31st December, Punjab’s Advocate General informed the Supreme Court that leader Dallewal would accept medical aid only when the Centre invites farmers for talks. This statement came in response to ongoing issues concerning the farmer protests. The court had previously asked for updates on the matter. Dallewal’s condition remains a point of contention amidst the protests.
![[Justice Shekhar Yadav’s ‘Majority’ Remark] "Motion is Invalid & Attacks Freedom of Speech": PIL Challenges Impeachment](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-20-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A PIL has been filed against the impeachment motion of Justice Shekhar K. Yadav, arguing that his comments at a VHP meeting were misinterpreted and do not constitute hate speech. The petition emphasizes judicial independence and free speech rights, asserting that the allegations do not meet constitutional standards for judicial removal.
Former CJI DY Chandrachud warned that unrestricted freedom of speech can harm marginalized voices in an unequal society, as powerful individuals might misuse it to suppress others. He emphasized that unchecked liberty could disrupt social equality and harmony, advocating for fraternity as essential for democracy while acknowledging the complexities of free speech.
The Supreme Court emphasized that criminals are shaped by environmental and psychological factors, not inherent traits. It granted bail to an accused, highlighting the right to a speedy trial and appropriate bail considerations regardless of the crime’s severity, cautioning against deeming any criminal as irredeemable.
Yesterday, On 25th May, Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud, returned from an international trip in time to vote in the Lok Sabha elections, emphasizing the importance of citizen participation. His commitment to fulfilling his duty as a citizen and advocating for voter participation underscores the crucial role of every individual, including high-ranking officials, in shaping the country’s future.
Today(on 20th May),The Supreme Court’s Vacation Bench dismissed Sarla Srivastav’s plea to vote via postal ballot in the Lok Sabha elections due to her severe osteoarthritis and bedridden condition. The bench, headed by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, referred to discrepancies in her eligibility status according to Election Commission instructions, including age and disability categorization.
