• Tue. Oct 6th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: Constitutional Matters

    What Happens to This Civilization ? Constantly Questioning Religious Practices Will Break Religion : Supreme Court
    What Happens to This Civilization ? Constantly Questioning Religious Practices Will Break Religion : Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    What Happens to This Civilization ? Constantly Questioning Religious Practices Will Break Religion : Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court of India observed that if every religious practice or ritual is challenged before constitutional courts, it could lead to excessive litigation, weakening religions and affecting India’s civilizational fabric, while stressing that religion remains deeply connected with the country’s social structure.

    author
    Mukul Rohatgi Responds to AG’s Justification for Supreme Court Absence: Ditching a Court Hearing Midway Is Not Done
    Mukul Rohatgi Responds to AG’s Justification for Supreme Court Absence: Ditching a Court Hearing Midway Is Not Done
    Legal updatesHeadlines

    Mukul Rohatgi Responds to AG’s Justification for Supreme Court Absence: Ditching a Court Hearing Midway Is Not Done

    Former Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi responded after AG R Venkataramani justified his Supreme Court absence, saying, “While international arbitration may hold significant financial value, it is fundamentally a commercial issue that pales before a constitutional challenge.”

    author
    BREAKING| Tribunal Reforms Act Case| I Became Judge at 42, Perhaps I Didn’t Have Enough Experience Then: CJI Gavai on 50-Year Age Rule
    BREAKING| Tribunal Reforms Act Case| I Became Judge at 42, Perhaps I Didn’t Have Enough Experience Then: CJI Gavai on 50-Year Age Rule
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| Tribunal Reforms Act Case| I Became Judge at 42, Perhaps I Didn’t Have Enough Experience Then: CJI Gavai on 50-Year Age Rule

    Today, On 7th November, CJI Gavai remarked, “I Became a Judge at 42, Perhaps I Didn’t Have Enough Experience Then,” during the Supreme Court hearing on the Tribunal Reforms Act case, as Senior Advocate Arvind Datar questioned the 50-year minimum age requirement for tribunal appointments.

    author
    BREAKING| Tribunal Reforms Act Case | Engaged in Govt’s High-Stakes Arbitration Case: Attorney General Justifies Absence from Hearing
    BREAKING| Tribunal Reforms Act Case | Engaged in Govt’s High-Stakes Arbitration Case: Attorney General Justifies Absence from Hearing
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| Tribunal Reforms Act Case | Engaged in Govt’s High-Stakes Arbitration Case: Attorney General Justifies Absence from Hearing

    Attorney General clarified that his absence in the Madras Bar Association case was not to delay proceedings but because he was leading the Government of India’s high-stakes arbitration against Reliance, after CJI Gavai expressed displeasure over adjournment.

    author
    Madras Bar Association Case| CJI Gavai Slams Repeated Adjournments : Very Unfair to the Court
    Madras Bar Association Case| CJI Gavai Slams Repeated Adjournments : Very Unfair to the Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Madras Bar Association Case| CJI Gavai Slams Repeated Adjournments : Very Unfair to the Court

    Today, On 6th November, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai expressed sharp displeasure over repeated adjournments in the Madras Bar Association case, remarking that it was “very unfair to the Court” and questioning how many more times such delays would be sought.

    author
    Know Your Courts

    JUSTICE MANOJ MISHRA

    Justice Manoj Misra, born on June 2, 1965, graduated from the University of Allahabad in 1988 and began his legal career at the Allahabad High Court. After 23 years in practice, he became an Additional Judge in 2011 and a Permanent Judge in 2013. He was appointed as a Supreme Court Judge on February 6, 2023.

    author