INDIA bloc’s Vice-President candidate Sudershan Reddy defended his Salwa Judum judgement, telling Amit Shah to “read the judgement and then speak.” He said he will continue to protect the Constitution.
Justice Sanjay Karol urges students to “Be Alive and Live the Constitution,” emphasizing compassion, awareness, and holistic growth as guiding principles for future lawyers and responsible citizens.
Justice Sanjay Karol said the Constitution carries compassion for every human being, not just Indian citizens, while urging law students to “live the Constitution.” He called the Constitution his favourite book and a reminder of duty.
Justice Sudershan Reddy, Opposition’s VP pick, responds to criticism over the Salwa Judum verdict, affirming that his only ideology is the Constitution and constitutional morality.
The Supreme Court will continue hearing the AIFF Constitution case, focusing on contract compliance and related disputes. The next hearing is scheduled for 28th August at 1:15 PM, as parties prepare to address financial and logistical issues.
Assent To Bills | Day 3 | The Supreme Court Constitution Bench Today (Aug 20) heard a crucial Presidential reference on whether Governors and the President can delay or withhold Bills passed by State legislatures indefinitely. Key debates focus on the interpretation of Article 200 and whether judicial timelines can restrict constitutional powers.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta Today (Aug 20) told the Supreme Court that the Governor’s office carries “sanctity” and cannot be treated as a political shelter. The Constitution gives the Governor independent powers, but the court questioned whether such powers could override elected governments.
Presidential Reference Row | The Supreme Court Today (Aug 20) asked if harmony between governors and state governments, as imagined by Constitution makers, is truly working today. Heated exchanges between CJI, Solicitor General, and senior lawyers brought humour and sharp constitutional debates.
The Supreme Court Constitution Bench Today (Aug 19) is hearing President Murmu’s reference on time limits for Governors to act on Bills. Kerala and Tamil Nadu oppose it, while the Centre backs it, leading to sharp legal exchanges.
The Punjab government has challenged the Governor’s decision to send a reference to the President under Article 200, while the Union government has sought the Supreme Court’s nod to refer the matter to a five-judge constitutional bench.
