Gurminder Singh has resigned as Punjab’s Advocate General, making him the fourth AG to step down during AAP’s three-year tenure. His exit comes amid reports of government dissatisfaction following multiple legal setbacks. In his place, senior advocate Maninderjit Singh Bedi has been appointed as the new Advocate General. This latest change highlights ongoing legal shifts under the AAP administration.
Today, On 20th March, The Supreme Court has refused to entertain a plea challenging the DDA’s demolition of temples in Mayur Vihar, Delhi. Petitioners argued that the demolition violated constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 25 and was done without a proper hearing. They accused the DDA of acting arbitrarily, disregarding previous court judgments. The court, however, declined to intervene, reinforcing the need for legal compliance in land use.
In a Supreme Court divorce case, a wife received a flat near Mumbai without paying stamp duty on the transfer. On February 28, 2025, the husband won the case without any alimony obligations. However, the court directed him to give up all rights to the Godrej flat. It ruled that the wife is exempt from stamp duty under Section 17(2)(vi).
Today, On 4th March, The Supreme Court issued a stay on the recruitment of judges in Gujarat. The Court questioned why the hiring process was rushed while a case about eligibility is still being reviewed by a three-judge Bench. This decision means the recruitment will remain paused until the matter is resolved. The ruling could impact the selection process for judges in the state.
The Supreme Court ruled that the existence of a disputed question of fact does not bar the High Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226. If the State raises disputes merely to justify rejecting a writ petition, the court must dismiss such objections. The ruling reinforces the High Court’s power to intervene in cases of constitutional rights violations. This ensures that legal remedies are not denied on technical grounds.
Former CJI Chandrachud defended the Supreme Court’s verdict on Article 370, stating that the provision was always meant to fade away. In an interview with the BBC, he highlighted that it was introduced as a temporary measure due to war conditions. He emphasized that the Court upheld the elected government’s decision to abrogate it. According to him, the ruling aligns with the constitutional framework and historical context.
The Delhi High Court set aside earlier guidelines issued to trial courts regarding victim compensation. It ruled that requiring the accused or convict to submit an affidavit disclosing their assets and liabilities violates constitutional and statutory rights. The judgment emphasizes the need to balance victims’ rights with the legal protections afforded to the accused. This decision could impact the approach trial courts take in compensation-related matters.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the importance of gender neutrality in ensuring a fair justice system. It highlighted that fairness in law should apply to everyone, regardless of gender. The court stressed that societal biases and stereotypes often harm victims, especially in cases like domestic violence. Justice must be equal and unbiased for true equality.
NEW DELHI: On Tuesday, January 21, the Supreme Court dismissed petitions filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) seeking to cancel the bail granted to Chhagan Bhujbal, former Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister and current NCP MLA, and his nephew Sameer Bhujbal. The case is linked to allegations of money laundering in the Maharashtra Sadan scam.