The Supreme Court upheld the use of Urdu on Maharashtra municipal signboards, saying that Urdu is a language of the people and not connected to any religion. The Court added that there is no legal issue with using Urdu alongside Marathi.
Today, On 15th April, The Supreme Court will consider a fresh plea challenging the provisions of the 2025 Waqf Act, with the Chief Justice stating, “We give dates mostly within a week” for cases involving mentioning slips. The petitioners argue the amendments infringe on Muslim religious autonomy and the management of waqf properties.
Today, On 9th April, Samajwadi Party MP from Sambhal, Zia Ur Rehman Barq, has filed a case in the Supreme Court against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. He said the new law is unfair to the Muslim community. According to him, it puts special restrictions on Waqf properties that are not there for other religions. He believes this law is against the idea of equality and religious freedom in India.
Today, On 8th April, The All India Association of Jurists filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The petition argues that the Act infringes upon fundamental rights and violates constitutional principles. It raises concerns over increased government control and the inclusion of non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards. The case is expected to prompt a significant judicial review of the newly enforced legislation.
Today, On 8th April, The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, came into effect on April 8, 2025, after being passed by Parliament and receiving the President’s assent. The Act introduces key reforms in the governance of waqf properties across India. It aims to enhance transparency, prevent misuse, and improve administrative efficiency. The Ministry of Minority Affairs has issued an official notification confirming its enforcement.
A fresh plea has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf Act, 2025. The petition argues that the Act amounts to a “blatant intrusion into the rights of a religious group to manage its own affairs concerning religion.” It claims the legislation violates Article 26 of the Constitution, which guarantees religious denominations autonomy in religious matters. The court is yet to list the matter for detailed hearing.
The Karnataka High Court urged Parliament and State legislatures to bring in a Uniform Civil Code. The Court stated that such a code would uphold justice for women and promote equality across all castes and religions. It emphasized the importance of individual dignity and fraternity. The suggestion aims to foster a more unified and fair legal framework for all citizens.
Today, On 4th April, The Supreme Court refused to consider a plea seeking a social media ban for children under 13. It said that such matters should be handled by the government, not the court. The petition claimed that too much screen time is causing a mental health crisis among children. It urged stricter rules, but the court left the decision to policymakers.
Today, On 1st April, The Supreme Court strongly criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for the “inhuman” demolition of houses. The court reminded the state of the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring due process. It stressed that administrative actions must be fair and legal, protecting citizens’ rights. The remarks highlight growing judicial scrutiny over demolition drives in the state.