The Delhi High Court held that holding a passport and travelling abroad is integral to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav quashed impounding orders, citing violation of natural justice principles.
Advocate has moved the High Court challenging the Maharashtra government’s cancellation of the 5% Muslim quota, calling the decision unjustified. The plea alleges state is practicing racial discrimination against the Muslim community, violating fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, speaking before CJI Surya Kant at the Calcutta High Court’s Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench inauguration, urged the judiciary to protect the Constitution and democracy. Her remarks came amid the ED raids controversy involving I-PAC, with Banerjee alleging deliberate targeting by central agencies.
Minority schools have approached the Delhi High Court challenging a new law that makes government approval mandatory for school fee increases. They argue the law violates Article 30 of the Constitution, which protects minority institutions’ right to manage their own affairs.
Former Supreme Court judge Justice Abhay S Oka said judges are guided only by the Constitution and law, rejecting any ‘divine’ or external influence in delivering verdicts. He stressed that every judicial decision must strictly stand the test of constitutional principles and legal reasoning.
The Supreme Court emphasized that liberty in India’s Constitution is not a privilege granted by the State but its foremost responsibility. This came while hearing a passport renewal plea of a coal block convict facing UAPA charges.
President Droupadi Murmu released the Constitution of India in Santhali language written in the Ol Chiki script, calling it a proud moment for the Santhali community. The move will help Santhali-speaking tribal citizens easily read and understand the Constitution in their own language.
Former Chief Justice of India B R Gavai said judges must exercise restraint while pronouncing verdicts, as even light remarks are often taken out of context. He stressed that judges should decide cases strictly on facts, law, and the Constitution, not public approval.
The Supreme Court ruled that Section 35 of the SARFAESI Act cannot override any provision of the Constitution, including special protections under Article 371A for Nagaland. The Court held that SARFAESI action taken before the Act’s adoption in Nagaland was without jurisdiction and legally invalid.
Discover the importance of Samvidhan Divas, the journey of India’s Constitution from the Preamble to key amendments, and how the world’s longest written Constitution continues to shape democracy, rights, and governance in modern India.
