BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row: Governor Cannot Return Bills Without Saying Why: CJI Gavai

Today, on 20th November, As the Supreme Court delivers its advisory opinion in the Presidential Reference row, CJI Gavai says the Governor cannot return Bills without giving reasons, stressing that Article 200 demands constitutional balance, transparency and accountability in every decision made.

BREAKING | District Judge Appointments: CJI Says Selection Grade Follows Merit Cum Seniority, States & UTs Told to Amend Rules in 3 Months

Today, On 19th November, in the District Judge Appointments case, Supreme Court says Selection Grade follows merit cum seniority and orders all States and UTs to amend service rules within three months, ensuring uniform implementation of new roster, seniority, and promotion guidelines across the judicial services system.

BREAKING| If Seniority Alone Decides Promotions, What Motivation Remains?: Supreme Court On All India Judges Case

The Supreme Court’s Constitution Bench, led by CJI BR Gavai, wrapped up the All India Judges Association hearing, questioning if promotions based solely on seniority kill merit. Justice Surya Kant’s sharp remarks reignited the debate on fairness in judicial career growth.

Tamil Nadu Governor Bills Dispute: Supreme Court to List Matter After Constitution Bench Decides Presidential Reference

Today, On 17th October, The Supreme Court heard the Tamil Nadu government’s plea challenging the Governor’s withholding of certain Bills. The matter will be listed only after the Constitution Bench decides the Presidential reference, resolving key legal questions on Governor powers.

BREAKING| Judicial Promotions Case| How Many Appointed Through Direct Recruitment and Judicial Service?: CJI Seeks Data from High Courts

Today, On 14th October the Supreme Court decided that it will hear Judicial Promotions Case on October 28–29, with CJI Seeking Data from All High Courts: “How Many Appointed Through Direct Recruitment and Judicial Service?” to Examine Seniority and Promotion Patterns in the Judiciary.

BREAKING| 7-Year Bar Practice Qualifies Judicial Officers for District Judge Posts: Supreme Court’s Big Ruling

Today, On 9th October, Supreme Court rules that judicial officers who have completed 7 years of practice at the Bar before joining service are now eligible for appointment as District Judges. Minimum age for application set at 35 years.

Babri Masjid Was Desecration Remark | Ayodhya Verdict Can Be Contested Through Curative Petition Based on Ex-CJI Chandrachud’s Statement: Prof. G Mohan Gopal

Prof. Mohan Gopal said the Ayodhya judgment can be challenged through a curative petition based on Ex-CJI DY Chandrachud’s remark that the very erection of the Babri Masjid was an act of desecration of a temple.

BREAKING| Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy: Supreme Court 5-Judge Bench Reserves Verdict

The Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on whether judicial officers with seven years’ prior Bar experience can apply for district judge posts under the Bar quota. The ruling will clarify the scope of Article 233 and impact judicial recruitment nationwide.

Can Judicial Officer with 7+ Years at Bar Eligible for District Judge Post ?: Supreme Court Debates

Today, On 23rd September, Supreme Court debates whether judicial officers with seven or more years of experience under the Bar vacancies, can be eligible for direct recruitment as District Judges. The hearing focused on interpretation of Article 233 and past legal precedents.

BREAKING |Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy: Supreme Court 5-Judge Bench Commences Hearing

Today, On 23rd September, A five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court has commenced hearing on the eligibility of judicial officers for appointment as district judges under Bar vacancies, addressing a crucial legal question with wide implications for judicial recruitment.