• Sat. Dec 20th, 2025
    • '

    Tag: CONSTITUTION BENCH

    Babri Masjid Was Desecration Remark | Ayodhya Verdict Can Be Contested Through Curative Petition Based on Ex-CJI Chandrachud’s Statement: Prof. G Mohan Gopal
    Babri Masjid Was Desecration Remark | Ayodhya Verdict Can Be Contested Through Curative Petition Based on Ex-CJI Chandrachud’s Statement: Prof. G Mohan Gopal
    Legal updatesHeadlines

    Babri Masjid Was Desecration Remark | Ayodhya Verdict Can Be Contested Through Curative Petition Based on Ex-CJI Chandrachud’s Statement: Prof. G Mohan Gopal

    Prof. Mohan Gopal said the Ayodhya judgment can be challenged through a curative petition based on Ex-CJI DY Chandrachud’s remark that the very erection of the Babri Masjid was an act of desecration of a temple.

    author
    Supreme Court Reserves Verdict on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for District Judge Posts Under Bar Quota
    Supreme Court Reserves Verdict on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for District Judge Posts Under Bar Quota
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy: Supreme Court 5-Judge Bench Reserves Verdict

    The Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on whether judicial officers with seven years’ prior Bar experience can apply for district judge posts under the Bar quota. The ruling will clarify the scope of Article 233 and impact judicial recruitment nationwide.

    author
    Can Judicial Officer with 7+ Years at Bar Eligible for District Judge Post ?: Supreme Court Debates
    Can Judicial Officer with 7+ Years at Bar Eligible for District Judge Post ?: Supreme Court Debates
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Can Judicial Officer with 7+ Years at Bar Eligible for District Judge Post ?: Supreme Court Debates

    Today, On 23rd September, Supreme Court debates whether judicial officers with seven or more years of experience under the Bar vacancies, can be eligible for direct recruitment as District Judges. The hearing focused on interpretation of Article 233 and past legal precedents.

    author
    BREAKING |Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy: Supreme Court 5-Judge Bench Commences Hearing
    BREAKING |Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy: Supreme Court 5-Judge Bench Commences Hearing
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING |Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy: Supreme Court 5-Judge Bench Commences Hearing

    Today, On 23rd September, A five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court has commenced hearing on the eligibility of judicial officers for appointment as district judges under Bar vacancies, addressing a crucial legal question with wide implications for judicial recruitment.

    author
    BREAKING |Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy: Supreme Court 5-Judge Bench Commences Hearing
    BREAKING |Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy: Supreme Court 5-Judge Bench Commences Hearing
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING | Judicial Officer’s Eligibility for District Judge Appointment in Bar Vacancy : Supreme Court to Hear Case On September 23

    Today, On 12th September, The Supreme Court Constitution Bench agreed that it will hear on September 23 on whether a judicial officer with more than seven years’ bar experience before joining service can be considered eligible for appointment as a district judge in bar quota vacancies.

    author
    Assent To Bills | Day 11 | No Issue If Governor Returns a Bill With a Message, But Can He Indefinitely Withhold?: Supreme Court Reserves Judgment
    Assent To Bills | Day 11 | No Issue If Governor Returns a Bill With a Message, But Can He Indefinitely Withhold?: Supreme Court Reserves Judgment
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Assent To Bills | Day 11 | No Issue If Governor Returns a Bill With a Message, But Can He Indefinitely Withhold?: Supreme Court Reserves Judgment

    Today, on 11th September, on Day 11 of the Presidential Reference Row on Assent to Bills, the Supreme Court discussed the Governor’s powers regarding bills. The CJI asked, “No issue if Governor returns a Bill with a message, but can he indefinitely withhold?” Judgment has been reserved.

    author
    BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row| If One Wing of Democracy Fails, Would the Court Be Powerless and Forced to Sit Idle?: CJI Questions Centre 
    BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row| If One Wing of Democracy Fails, Would the Court Be Powerless and Forced to Sit Idle?: CJI Questions Centre 
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row| If One Wing of Democracy Fails, Would the Court Be Powerless and Forced to Sit Idle?: CJI Questions Centre 

    Today, on 11th September, in the Presidential Reference Row, CJI Gavai asks, “If one wing of democracy fails, would the Court be powerless and forced to sit idle?” He questions the Centre, stressing the judiciary’s role as custodian of the Constitution and protector of democratic principles.

    author
    Assent To Bills | Day 11 | No Issue If Governor Returns a Bill With a Message, But Can He Indefinitely Withhold?: Supreme Court Reserves Judgment
    Assent To Bills | Day 11 | No Issue If Governor Returns a Bill With a Message, But Can He Indefinitely Withhold?: Supreme Court Reserves Judgment
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Assent To Bills | Day 10 | How Can You Claim False Alarm If Governors Have Been Sitting on Bills for Four Years?: CJI Questions Centre 

    Today, on 10th September, on Day 10 of the Presidential Reference Row on Assent to Bills, Chief Justice of India questioned the Centre, asking, “How can you claim ‘false alarm’ if Governors have been sitting on bills for four years?”

    author
    BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row| Governor Is Not a Servant of Government, but an Independent Constitutional Office: Centre Tells Supreme Court
    BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row| Governor Is Not a Servant of Government, but an Independent Constitutional Office: Centre Tells Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row| Governor Is Not a Servant of Government, but an Independent Constitutional Office: Centre Tells Supreme Court

    Today, on 10th September, In the ongoing Presidential Reference Row, the Centre told the Supreme Court that the Governor is not a servant of the government but an independent constitutional office, exercising implied discretion to uphold and defend the Constitution in crucial circumstances.

    author
    BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row: Governor Cannot Return Bills Without Saying Why: CJI Gavai
    BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row: Governor Cannot Return Bills Without Saying Why: CJI Gavai
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row: Citizen Cannot Become a Sitting Duck: Advocate Tells Supreme Court

    Today, on 10th September, in the Presidential Reference Row, Advocate Avani Bansal tells the Supreme Court that citizens cannot be left helpless due to delays in gubernatorial decisions. Timely action is essential to prevent arbitrary use of powers by Governors and preserve constitutional governance.

    author