The Madras High Court criticised the Centre for making a woman cybercrime victim watch objectionable videos with seven male officers. “Does it not amount to violating her right to dignity?” the court asked while directing corrective action.
The Bombay High Court asserted that prior relationships do not imply consent for future sexual activity, reinforcing that “No means no.” The court rejected arguments questioning the survivor’s character by the convicted rapists and reaffirmed their conviction, emphasizing that rape is an assault on a woman’s dignity and privacy.
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to a 20-year-old accused of rape, emphasizing that a sexually experienced adult’s lack of resistance in a relationship suggests consent unless proven otherwise. The court questioned the complainant’s narrative, citing the absence of medical evidence and allegations of malicious intent, while imposing strict conditions on the accused to ensure legal compliance.
![[Marital Rape] "Will Bring Home Justice For Women In This Case": Snr Adv Karuna Nundy | SC Relisted Matter After 4 Weeks](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/IMG.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India Today (Oct 23), postponed the hearing of multiple petitions that seek the criminalization of marital rape in the country. The hearing, overseen by a Bench composed of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, was deferred after the counsel from both sides laid out the time required for presenting their arguments. According to the submissions made by the lawyers, each side will need at least one full day to make their case. This led the Court to conclude that a judgment cannot be delivered before CJI Chandrachud’s retirement, which is scheduled for November 10, 2024.
Today, On 22nd October, the Supreme Court began hearings on marital rape, examining whether husbands should be exempt from prosecution. Petitioners argue for legal equality for women, challenging existing provisions in Indian law. Advocates highlight that criminalizing marital rape does not threaten marriage, while the government warns of potential negative impacts on marital relationships.
Today, On 26th September, Karnataka revoked the CBI’s authorization to investigate within the state, citing concerns of bias amid allegations of targeted actions against opposition leaders, particularly ahead of elections. This decision does not relate to the ongoing MUDA land scam involving Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, who faces scrutiny but denies any wrongdoing.