The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi government to constitute an independent multidisciplinary Medical Board to decide, within four weeks, on parents’ request for a hysterectomy for their adult daughter with cerebral palsy, holding that disability alone can never be the only ground to deny reproductive autonomy and that its order is not an approval of the surgery.
In one of the first Supreme Court readings of Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Court quashed a “false promise of marriage” FIR, holding that the new offence carries the same rigour as the old law: the promise must have been made with no intention of ever fulfilling it. New Delhi: The Supreme […]
A PIL before the Supreme Court seeks a regulatory framework for stand-up comedy, podcasts, live streams, and digital content. The plea over the “Rs 370 Biryani” controversy argues that creators should not face criminal action and highlights algorithm-driven content spread.
A Bengaluru woman’s alleged Bumble date video leak case has highlighted concerns around intimate image abuse, privacy violations, and cybercrime. The incident raises legal questions on consent, digital safety, and misuse of private content, with Indian laws providing remedies against such violations.
The Chhattisgarh High Court held that a long-term live-in relationship between consenting adults creates a presumption of consensual physical relations. The Court ruled that a later refusal to marry cannot automatically amount to rape and dismissed an appeal challenging the accused’s acquittal.
Supreme Court held that threatening to upload on social media a video showing a woman disrobing or bathing amounts to criminal intimidation under Section 506 IPC Such threat is treated as imputing unchastity and criminal intimidation offence also
The Madras High Court criticised the Centre for making a woman cybercrime victim watch objectionable videos with seven male officers. “Does it not amount to violating her right to dignity?” the court asked while directing corrective action.
Aarti, the estranged wife of Ravi Mohan, has sought Rs.40 lakh as monthly alimony. Meanwhile, Ravi Mohan has once again claimed in the Chennai Family Court that he has already granted her a divorce.
The Bombay High Court asserted that prior relationships do not imply consent for future sexual activity, reinforcing that “No means no.” The court rejected arguments questioning the survivor’s character by the convicted rapists and reaffirmed their conviction, emphasizing that rape is an assault on a woman’s dignity and privacy.
The Supreme Court criticised the 2024 Arbitration Bill for ignoring the tribunal’s power to include non-signatories in arbitration. It stated, “Arbitral Tribunal can make non-signatories parties,” urging the Centre to amend the law.
