India’s arbitration system has grown significantly, but Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said major hurdles still exist, especially in building trust, strengthening institutions, and ensuring a continuous pool of skilled arbitration professionals to support the country’s evolving dispute resolution framework.
Today, On 26th February, The Supreme Court criticised India’s tribunals as a burden on the judiciary and a “headache” for the Centre, with CJI Kant saying they have become a “no man’s land” lacking accountability, making the system a government-created liability.
The Delhi High Court urged mediation in the Sunjay Kapur estate dispute, noting sides are suffering and the matter is unfolding publicly. The Bench said parties must try as Rani Kapur has suffered and Priya Kapur is strained.
Mediation is now widely viewed as an effective, economical, and mutually beneficial method for resolving disputes, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said. He made these remarks during a symbolic ‘Mediation Awareness’ walk held near the Kala Academy in Panaji.
Attorney General R. Venkataramani urged the creation of a national mediation movement, stressing that “mediation is not just a process; it is a powerful tool for national development and justice,” calling on law schools and legal professionals to promote dialogue over conflict.
CJI BR Gavai stressed that mediation and dialogue can turn conflicts into opportunities for growth and harmony, citing the importance of the Mediation Act, 2023. Speaking at the National Mediation Conference in Bhubaneswar, he underlined the role of mediation in reducing case pendency and building trust in justice delivery.
Today, On 30th August, The NALSA-KeLSA legal conference on human-wildlife conflict began in Kerala, where Justice MM Sundresh stressed that reckless human actions drive the crisis. Referring to a WhatsApp message, he noted, “If animals could have a religion, man would be devil.”
Elvish Yadav, known for his strong personality, opened up about his controversies and legal troubles, saying, “A lot of time is wasted in court,” as he reflected on the lessons learned from his past experiences.
Justice B.R. Gavai’s remarks after the Pahalgam attack emphasize peace and dialogue over war, reinforcing the judiciary’s commitment to constitutional values. His call for restraint over retaliation reflects India’s tradition of non-violence, embodying the principles of Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. Gavai advocates for civil liberties amidst rising tensions.
Today, On 9th January, The mosque committee has approached the Supreme Court, requesting the district magistrate to ensure the status quo on a well located outside the mosque. The committee fears potential changes to the well’s current condition amid rising tensions. The plea emphasizes the importance of preserving communal harmony. The Supreme Court’s response is awaited on this matter.
