The Delhi High Court upheld a commercial court order striking off a written statement after an advocate casually said “De denge” while ignoring cost payment directions. The Court called the excuse flimsy and stressed strict compliance with timelines under the Commercial Courts Act.
The Delhi High Court referred a trademark dispute between Kushmanda Power Limited (KPL) and Ola Electric concerning the term “Bharat Cell” to mediation. Both companies lack registered trademarks for “Bharat Cell.” The court believes mediation is appropriate as trademark rights remain unsettled, with the next hearing in August 2025.
Supreme Court Justice N Kotiswar Singh highlighted the lack of expertise among judges in handling commercial cases. He emphasized that judges are generalists, not specialists, making it challenging to deal with complex commercial disputes. Speaking at a legal event, he stressed the need for specialized training to improve judicial efficiency. His remarks underscore the importance of reforming commercial courts for better dispute resolution.
Last week(on Thursday), Justice K V Viswanathan, in a seminar by ‘Nivaaran-Mediators of the Supreme Court,’ stressed the crucial role of mediation in resolving disputes. He highlighted its transparency and efficacy in providing relief amid a mounting caseload. He advocated for a mediation culture in India, emphasizing the urgent need to address the significant backlog of cases through this approach, promoting its advantages and potential.
