CLAT PG candidates have approached the Kerala High Court against the counselling fee, saying it “fails to consider socio-economic disparities” and ends up excluding deserving students from poor backgrounds, violating the principle of equal opportunity.
Today, On 9th April, The Delhi High Court questioned whether it is reasonable to expect a Class 12 student to have knowledge of Contract Law while assessing the CLAT 2025 UG paper. This came up during hearings on multiple petitions highlighting alleged errors in the exam. The petitioners argued that the paper included concepts beyond the expected syllabus. The Court has now concluded the hearings and reserved its judgment.
![[BREAKING] Supreme Court May Transfer CLAT 2025 Result Petitions to Punjab and Haryana High Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CLAT-2025.webp?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
![[CLAT 2025 Questions Errors] Single Judge 'Charitable' in Calling CLAT Questions 'Demonstrably Wrong': Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CLAT-2025-Question-Errors-_-Law-Aspirant-Files-An-Appeal-In-Delhi-HC-Challenging-Single-Judges-Verdict.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court, On Tuesday(24th Dec) led by Acting CJ Vibhu Bhakru, addressed a challenge to CLAT 2025 regarding errors in the English comprehension section. Justice Jyoti Singh had previously identified mistakes affecting candidates’ results and mandated revisions. The NLU Consortium has since contested this judgment, claiming it overstepped judicial boundaries.
The NLU Consortium has appealed to the Delhi High Court against a ruling that required revising CLAT 2025 results due to errors identified in the exam questions. The court acknowledged mistakes in two questions and mandated corrections, while the Consortium argues this judicial intervention oversteps boundaries on academic matters. Both sides await further hearings.
Petitioners have challenged the CLAT 2025 today (5th Dec) provisional answer key in the Supreme Court, citing errors in 12 questions and inadequate time to raise objections. They seek a stay on results and admission counseling, criticizing the Rs 1,000 fee for objections despite a prior Rs 4,000 exam fee. Final results are due December 10.
