The Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on whether to reconsider the wide definition of “industry” under the Industrial Disputes Act. The ruling could significantly impact labour rights, businesses, and the future of industrial regulation in India.
The Tamil Nadu HR&CE body told the Supreme Court that temples lack profit motive and cannot be treated as “industry” under labour laws. The issue arises in a crucial hearing where the Court is reconsidering its 1978 ruling on the definition of “industry.”
The Centre told the Supreme Court that welfare schemes and sovereign functions cannot be treated as industrial activity under labour laws. The 9-judge bench is now set to redefine the scope of “industry” under the Industrial Disputes Act.
The Supreme Court declined to intervene in a plea raising concerns about mercury leakage from incinerated waste linked to the Bhopal gas tragedy. The court asked the petitioner organisation to approach the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which has been monitoring the case for decades.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said democracies invest in higher education to create responsible citizens capable of self-governance, not just prosperous graduates. Speaking at the Central University of Haryana convocation, he urged students to use education to strengthen public institutions and serve society.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said artificial intelligence can help courts with research and efficiency but cannot replace human judges in delivering justice. He stressed that interpreting the law and ensuring fairness must always remain the responsibility of the judiciary.
The Supreme Court of India plans to deploy Artificial Intelligence to manage case listing and bench allocation, reducing human intervention in the roster process. The reform aims to improve transparency, fix registry lapses, and ensure faster and more efficient justice delivery.
The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL filed by a Ludhiana hosiery trader seeking transparency in the PM CARES Fund after he admitted using AI tools and paying a typist with four jackets. The Court rebuked the petitioner, calling the plea vague and warning against filing frivolous PILs.
The Supreme Court strongly criticised applications questioning the integrity of judicial officers involved in West Bengal’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. CJI Surya Kant said the Court “will not tolerate” attempts to cast doubt on judicial officers handling the voter verification exercise.
Surya Kant said institutional intent alone cannot improve women’s representation in the higher judiciary, urging High Court collegiums to consider deserving women lawyers and expand the zone of consideration so their elevation to the Bench becomes the norm.
